Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

D.N.R. Tattoo – to Resuscitate or Not to Resuscitate?

D.N.R. Tattoo – to Resuscitate or Not to Resuscitate?

Mann Lawyers

Posted March 12, 2018

When an unconscious patient was admitted to the hospital with a “Do Not Resuscitate” tattoo on his chest, doctors knew they were facing an unusual dilemma.

To Resuscitate or Not to Resuscitate.

In 2012, the Journal of General Internal Medicine outlined the “Cautionary Tale” of a 59-year-old patient who had a “D.N.R.” tattoo across his chest but expressed his wishes to be resuscitated in the event of a cardiac or respiratory arrest. When asked why he had the tattoo, the patient explained that he had “lost a bet playing poker while inebriated in his younger years”. The patient further declined a tattoo removal as he did not think anyone would take his tattoo seriously.

He declined.


The New England Journal of Medicine outlined a comparable case in 2017. A 70-year-old man was brought into an emergency room in Florida with the words “Do Not Resuscitate” across his chest along with a signature. The word “Not” was underlined.

Faced with an ethical and legal dilemma, the medical team struggled for answers. The hospital’s ethics consultants advised the doctors to “honor the patient’s do not resuscitate tattoo” as it was “most reasonable to infer that the tattoo expressed an authentic preference”, and that the law is “not nimble enough” to respect the best interests of the patient.

To everyone’s relief, the patient’s hospital documentation confirmed his tattooed wishes. Unfortunately, the patient status deteriorated and he died without life-saving measures leaving us with the same burning question: Is a D.N.R. tattoo a true representation of a patient’s current intent? Is it legally binding? Does it prevent a health care provider from proceeding with life-saving measures?

Ok. Questions: plural.

A Living Will

It might not allow for as much of an artistic expression as a tattoo would, but a Living Will is your best bet when considering end-of-life instructions on medical treatments.

In Ontario, a Living Will,  Advance Health Care Directive and Proxy are documents where a person expresses his or her final wishes for end-of-life medical care should he or she become mentally incapable or unable to communicate consent or refusal for medical treatments.  These documents set out instructions as to what health treatments may or may not be administered, and can include both positive and negative directions as well as a terminal condition.

The person can direct to be allowed to die with dignity and not be kept alive by medications, artificial means or “heroic measures” if and when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery from a physical or mental illness. Alternatively, the person may express his or her choice to be kept alive using all possible means and measures.

The Attorney for Personal Care is the person called upon to make a decision on behalf of the incapable person as to the giving or withholding of consent to a proposed treatment.  The powers and duties for an Attorney for Personal Care are set out in the Substitute Decisions Act and the Heath Care Consent Act and must be exercised diligently and in good faith.

The attorney for Personal Care’s role is to be a substitute decision maker. The attorney for Personal Care makes decisions in accordance with the wishes of the incapable person as provided in the Living Will. Where the incapable person’ wishes are unknown or not possible to comply with, the attorney must act in the incapable person’s best interests to the extent permitted by law.

In conclusion, when considering end-of-life measures, seek the advice of an experienced lawyer, not that of a tattoo artist.

And when considering a tattoo, think twice.

Oumnia El Fadl is an Articling Student at Mann Lawyers LLP.  For further information, please contact any member of the Wills and Estates team.

More Resources

Blog |
Family Law


Posted November 29, 2022

When a Court is charged with structuring a parenting arrangement leading up to trial, the bench is often faced with conflicting and untested evidence about[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights


Posted November 24, 2022

The Employment Standards Act, 2000, “ESA” has been amended to require that Ontario employers create an electronic monitoring policy per the requirements of Bill 88,[...]
Blog |
Commercial Litigation


Posted November 22, 2022

In Ontario, the Small Claims Court offers parties a more expedient, cost-effective process for litigating smaller value claims, in comparison to the processes of the[...]
Blog |
Business Law


Posted November 14, 2022

Private corporations governed under the Canada Business Corporations Act (“CBCA”) will soon be required to report certain information about individuals with significant control directly to[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law


Posted November 8, 2022

Biodiversity is immensely important to our ecosystem.  Species at risk face considerable threat to their continued existence, much of which results from human harm to[...]
Blog |
Estate Litigation, Wills, Trusts and Estates


Posted November 1, 2022

Disputes over funeral and burial arrangements can arise after the death of a loved one. These disputes may involve disagreements over the funeral arrangements, including[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.