Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin

Marriage Contracts: Have You Signed Under Duress or Undue Influence?

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Marriage Contracts: Have You Signed Under Duress or Undue Influence?

By:

Posted September 26, 2019

Many couples who are getting married talk about having a marriage contract. These contracts allow a couple to outline what happens to each of their property should they ever separate, even when that separation is due to death. A marriage contract also lets couples address the issue of spousal support, a claim that could be made if there is a separation.

It is not uncommon to see couples who want to sign their marriage contract in the weeks, even days, leading up to their wedding. A lot of time is spent on planning a wedding, which can lead to the marriage contract taking a longer time to negotiate, or taking a back seat completely, making the drafting process start late. It is also not uncommon to hear that one party insists on the contract being signed as a part of the marriage process.

However, the closer a marriage contract is signed to a wedding date, or the more a party feels they have to sign the contract prior to the wedding, the higher the risk is that the contract could be set aside in the future.

In Ontario, the Family Law Act provides for scenarios where a Court can find sections of a marriage contract to be invalid and then set aside parts of or all of the contract. Through cases, Courts have outlined that these scenarios include those where there has been clear duress and/or undue influence.

Cases have defined ‘duress’ as “a coercion of the will” or something which places pressure on a party, putting them in a position where there is “no realistic alternative but to submit to the pressure” (see Ludmer v Ludmer, 2013 ONSC 784). In cases where this is alleged, it is usually to say that the pressure was put on one party to sign an unfair contract or a contract that is one-sided, protecting only one spouse.

‘Undue influence’ is shown by demonstrating an inequity in bargaining power leading up to and/or at the time of signing the contract. A party has to show that the other “dominated” their will through manipulation, coercion or abuse of power (see M.D. v A.C., 2017, ONSC 6260).

Timing, like feeling the pressure to sign the contract before the wedding, can further heighten the sense of duress and/or undue influence.

Whether or not a marriage contract is found to be partially or fully invalid and set aside depends on the unique circumstances of the case. Each situation is very fact-specific; however, it is important to have a discussion about duress and undue influence with your partner, and a lawyer, prior to signing. If the wedding day is fast approaching, the option of signing the contract after the wedding may be the safer route – the pros and cons of which you should discuss with a lawyer.

Protecting oneself through a marriage contract is a sound approach; however, it is important that the manner in which the contract is finalized and signed stands the test of time.

This blog post was written by Olivia Koneval, a member of the Family Law team.  She can be reached at 613-369-0367 or at olivia.koneval@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Generally, the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”) has been interpreted to protect non-unionized employees from “temporary” lay offs unless their employment contract permits such a[...]
Blog |
Business Law

By: 

Posted October 20, 2021

On October 19, 2021, the new Ontario Business Registry System launched. This new online registry now enables businesses and not-for-profit corporations to directly access services[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law

By: 

Posted October 14, 2021

In the decision of Greenpeace Canada (2471256 Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks), 2021 ONSC 4521, released September 3, 2021,[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Posted October 1, 2021

This blog continues our exploration of the potential employment law consequences stemming from the degree of control a party exerts within a variety of business[...]
Blog |
Personal Injury

By: 

Posted September 27, 2021

Personal Injury lawyers and their clients are all too familiar with the carnage and suffering caused by impaired drivers.  Canada has the worst rate of[...]
Blog |
Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Business Law

By: 

Posted September 24, 2021

As is noted by the Court of Appeal in McEwen (Re), released August 12, 2021, referred to here as “Traders”, the BIA is a complete[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.