Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Over Involved Adult Children and Estate Planning:  When Does Assistance Become “Suspicious”?

Over Involved Adult Children and Estate Planning:  When Does Assistance Become “Suspicious”?

By:

Posted January 9, 2020

It is natural and expected that children want to assist their elderly or ill parents in any way that they can.  In the context of estate planning, however, there is a risk that too much “assistance” may cross the line to create circumstances that are suspicious, thus leading to a finding that a will is invalid.  This scenario was recently discussed in the case of Graham v. Graham 2019 ONSC 3632.

Some of the facts of this case were as follows:

  1. The deceased, Jackie, had four adult children. Her son Robert was married to Tammy;
  2. Jackie died of cancer on January 8, 2016, following a battle with cancer;
  3. Prior to her death, Jackie was hospitalized on two separate occasions due to severe pain. She was in the hospital from November 22, 2015, to December 7, 2015, and had to return to the hospital on December 22, 2015;
  4. Jackie’s son Robert and his wife Tammy made all arrangements with the lawyer regarding the will, even providing financial information;
  5. The will was signed on December 23, 2015. That meeting was the first time the lawyer met Jackie;
  6. Jackie was on heavy pain medication when she signed the will; and
  7. The will appointed Robert as Estate Trustee. A Power of Attorney was also signed which appointed Robert as Attorney for Property.  On January 4, 2016, Robert used the Power of Attorney to transfer Jackie’s house to himself.

The court cited the decision of Botnick et al. v. The Samuel and Bessie Orfus Family Foundation et al.   The court’s decision in Botnick expands on the reasons provided in the decision of Vout v. Hay, another case dealing with suspicious circumstances.  The court in Botnick enumerates factors which may be considered to determine whether suspicious circumstances exist.

When considering whether there are suspicious circumstances, the court may consider:

1) The extent of physical and mental impairment of the testator around the time the will is signed;

2) Whether the will in question constitutes a significant change from the former will;

3) Whether the will in question generally seems to make testamentary sense;

4) The factual circumstances surrounding the execution of the will; and

5) Whether a beneficiary was instrumental in the preparation of the will.

After finding that suspicious circumstances did exist, the court went on to consider Jackie’s testamentary capacity.  Referring to the test in Banks v. Goodfellow, the court found that Jackie did not have testamentary capacity.

The takeaway?  Children should exercise caution when providing assistance to parents in the context of estate planning.  Courts will examine these scenarios closely in order to be satisfied that the deceased wishes were his or her own and that there was an understanding of what they were doing throughout the process.

This blog post was written by Kate Wright, a member of the Family Law, Wills and Estates and Litigation teams.  She can be reached at 613-369-0383 or at kate.wright@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Family Law
By: 
Co-parenting with your ex-partner can be challenging. It involves constant coordination and communication about various aspects of your children’s lives. Whether it is about schedules,[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates
By: 
Over time, individuals could acquire assets in different jurisdictions that are governed by different legal systems. Similar to the consideration of double wills in distinguishing[...]
Blog |
Family Law
By: 

Posted January 31, 2024

In the first part of this series, we reviewed the background, trial, and appeal to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in Anderson v Anderson. This[...]
Blog |
Practice Management
By: 

Posted January 26, 2024

On July 17, 1797, ten lawyers were present at the Wilson’s Hotel in Newark, Upper Canada, to read “An Act for the better regulating the[...]
Blog |
Business Law
By: 

Posted January 23, 2024

A not-for-profit corporation incorporated pursuant to the Canada Not-for-Profit Corporations Act (the “CNCA”) is required to maintain certain records, including records as to its members,[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights
By: 

Posted January 17, 2024

In November of 2023, the Ontario government introduced new legislation, once again, amending the Employment Standards Act, strengthening employment and labour laws in the province.[...]
Kate Wright

Kate Wright

I am a member of the family law, wills and estates and estate litigation service groups at Mann Lawyers. I am an enthusiastic and compassionate advocate for my clients. My experience in family law includes advising clients on property division, support issues, custody and access matters, domestic contracts and private adoptions. I assist clients with preparing wills, estate planning and administration matters, and disputes over estates, including issues related to capacity and dependent’s relief. My approach to dispute resolution is based on the needs of each client and their own particular circumstances. I am trained in Collaborative Practice and am a member of Collaborative Practice Ottawa. I seek to empower clients to resolve issues in the manner that best suits their interests. I graduated from the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University in 2008. I articled with a national firm in Calgary and was called to the Alberta Bar... Read More

Read More About Kate Wright

Kate Wright

I am a member of the family law, wills and estates and estate litigation service groups at Mann Lawyers. I am an enthusiastic and compassionate advocate for my clients. My experience in family law includes advising clients on property division, support issues, custody and access matters, domestic contracts and private adoptions. I assist clients with preparing wills, estate planning and administration matters, and disputes over estates, including issues related to capacity and dependent’s relief. My approach to dispute resolution is based on the needs of each client and their own particular circumstances. I am trained in Collaborative Practice and am a member of Collaborative Practice Ottawa. I seek to empower clients to resolve issues in the manner that best suits their interests. I graduated from the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University in 2008. I articled with a national firm in Calgary and was called to the Alberta Bar... Read More

Read More About Kate Wright

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.