Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Over Involved Adult Children and Estate Planning:  When Does Assistance Become “Suspicious”?

Over Involved Adult Children and Estate Planning:  When Does Assistance Become “Suspicious”?


Posted January 9, 2020

It is natural and expected that children want to assist their elderly or ill parents in any way that they can.  In the context of estate planning, however, there is a risk that too much “assistance” may cross the line to create circumstances that are suspicious, thus leading to a finding that a will is invalid.  This scenario was recently discussed in the case of Graham v. Graham 2019 ONSC 3632.

Some of the facts of this case were as follows:

  1. The deceased, Jackie, had four adult children. Her son Robert was married to Tammy;
  2. Jackie died of cancer on January 8, 2016, following a battle with cancer;
  3. Prior to her death, Jackie was hospitalized on two separate occasions due to severe pain. She was in the hospital from November 22, 2015, to December 7, 2015, and had to return to the hospital on December 22, 2015;
  4. Jackie’s son Robert and his wife Tammy made all arrangements with the lawyer regarding the will, even providing financial information;
  5. The will was signed on December 23, 2015. That meeting was the first time the lawyer met Jackie;
  6. Jackie was on heavy pain medication when she signed the will; and
  7. The will appointed Robert as Estate Trustee. A Power of Attorney was also signed which appointed Robert as Attorney for Property.  On January 4, 2016, Robert used the Power of Attorney to transfer Jackie’s house to himself.

The court cited the decision of Botnick et al. v. The Samuel and Bessie Orfus Family Foundation et al.   The court’s decision in Botnick expands on the reasons provided in the decision of Vout v. Hay, another case dealing with suspicious circumstances.  The court in Botnick enumerates factors which may be considered to determine whether suspicious circumstances exist.

When considering whether there are suspicious circumstances, the court may consider:

1) The extent of physical and mental impairment of the testator around the time the will is signed;

2) Whether the will in question constitutes a significant change from the former will;

3) Whether the will in question generally seems to make testamentary sense;

4) The factual circumstances surrounding the execution of the will; and

5) Whether a beneficiary was instrumental in the preparation of the will.

After finding that suspicious circumstances did exist, the court went on to consider Jackie’s testamentary capacity.  Referring to the test in Banks v. Goodfellow, the court found that Jackie did not have testamentary capacity.

The takeaway?  Children should exercise caution when providing assistance to parents in the context of estate planning.  Courts will examine these scenarios closely in order to be satisfied that the deceased wishes were his or her own and that there was an understanding of what they were doing throughout the process.

This blog post was written by Kate Wright, a member of the Family Law, Wills and Estates and Litigation teams.  She can be reached at 613-369-0383 or at

More Resources

Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights, Commercial Litigation


Posted May 23, 2023

Both in my commercial and employment litigation practice, I encounter Ontario business owners faced with serious charges laid against them under the Provincial Offences Act[...]
Blog |
Family Law


Posted May 18, 2023

The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Anderson v. Anderson, 2023 SCC 13, provides guidance on domestic contracts and the enforceability of an informal[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law


Posted May 16, 2023

When many people think of contaminated sites, they think of the usual suspects such as industrial properties and gas stations.  They may not think of[...]
Blog |
Business Law


Posted May 9, 2023

Often business owners reach a point where they are considering the sale of their business either through the sale of shares or the sale of[...]
Blog |
Family Law


Posted May 2, 2023

Overview of Tort Claims in Family Matters Tort claims can be made in family law matters, so as to prevent a multiplicity of proceedings and[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights


Posted April 25, 2023

In a case that recently was decided from the Court of Appeal of Ontario called Celestini v Shoplogix Inc., 2023 ONCA 131, the Court had[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.