Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Providing for Disabled Beneficiaries: The Supreme Court of Canada and Henson Trusts

Providing for Disabled Beneficiaries: The Supreme Court of Canada and Henson Trusts

By:

Posted April 10, 2019

If you are preparing your will and you want to leave a gift for a beneficiary who is disabled, you need to ensure that you are receiving advice regarding the best way to provide for your loved one after your death.

There are various ways to provide for a disabled beneficiary after your death.  One way is to consider creating a “Henson Trust.”  A Henson Trust is an absolute discretionary trust, meaning the Trustee has absolute discretion over distributions from the trust.  Creating a Henson Trust will allow your beneficiary to continue to receive government supports such as income and benefits through the Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP). This is because the Henson Trust will not be considered an asset of the disabled person.  It is essential that the Henson Trust be carefully drafted and the discretion of the Trustee must be absolute.

The Supreme Court of Canada recently confirmed the use of Henson Trusts as a valid estate planning tool.  In the decision of S.A. v. Metro Vancouver Housing Corp., the appellant was seeking to have the Henson Trust, which was set up for her in her father’s will, excluded as an asset in determining her eligibility for a rent subsidy.  The trial judge and Court of Appeal both held that the trust was an asset and that information about its value had to be disclosed.  The Supreme Court of Canada overturned the decisions of the lower court and found that, insofar as the manner in which “asset” was defined by the Housing Corporation, the Henson Trust was not an asset she was required to disclose.

In its reasoning for the decision, the Supreme Court held that because the trust was absolutely discretionary and the beneficiary did not have the right to collapse the trust, the appellant’s interest was not such that it could be considered her asset – she had no right to access the property.  The definition of “asset” was also an important consideration in the Supreme Court’s decision and while the Henson Trust was not considered to fall under the definition of “asset” in this case, depending on the definition in other eligibility policies for other programs, it is possible that a Henson Trust may not be exempt.  Although this decision originates from a case in British Columbia, the reasons apply in Ontario and to beneficiaries located here.

If you would like more information on Henson Trusts or other estate planning topics, please contact one of our Wills and Estates lawyers.

This blog post was written by Kate Wright, a member of the Family Law, Wills and Estates and Litigation teams.  She can be reached at 613-369-0383 or at kate.wright@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights, Commercial Litigation

By: 

Posted May 23, 2023

Both in my commercial and employment litigation practice, I encounter Ontario business owners faced with serious charges laid against them under the Provincial Offences Act[...]
Blog |
Family Law

By: 

Posted May 18, 2023

The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Anderson v. Anderson, 2023 SCC 13, provides guidance on domestic contracts and the enforceability of an informal[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law

By: 

Posted May 16, 2023

When many people think of contaminated sites, they think of the usual suspects such as industrial properties and gas stations.  They may not think of[...]
Blog |
Business Law

By: 

Posted May 9, 2023

Often business owners reach a point where they are considering the sale of their business either through the sale of shares or the sale of[...]
Blog |
Family Law

By: 

Posted May 2, 2023

Overview of Tort Claims in Family Matters Tort claims can be made in family law matters, so as to prevent a multiplicity of proceedings and[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Posted April 25, 2023

In a case that recently was decided from the Court of Appeal of Ontario called Celestini v Shoplogix Inc., 2023 ONCA 131, the Court had[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.