Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Corporate Directors – The Duty of Care

Corporate Directors – The Duty of Care

By:

Mann Lawyers

Posted April 4, 2018

What is the standard of competence that directors must meet in carrying out their duties?

Serving as a corporate director in a corporation governed by the Canada Business Corporations Act (“CBCA”) imposes various duties on an individual. Such duties include a duty to manage, a fiduciary duty, and an obligation to disclose conflicts of interest.

Among these duties, section 122(1)(b) of the CBCA also imposes a duty of care on directors that reads as follows:

122 (1) Every director and officer of a corporation in exercising their powers and discharging their duties shall

[…]

(b) exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances.

This duty to be reasonably prudent cannot, in itself, ground a claim against a director. Rather, this standard informs the courts’ view of what behavior should be considered acceptable in the context of a claim brought under another provision – most often an oppression claim based on s. 241 of the CBCA, but occasionally in tort claims brought by third parties such as corporate creditors.

Courts want to see that directors seek out the information necessary to make a decision, carefully consider that information, and generally take the time to examine an issue thoroughly. When directors have done this, then courts will be very reluctant to find fault with the resulting decision. The fact that a given decision may have turned out badly for a corporation is not determinative of any breach of duty on the part of the directors. Canadian courts apply the “business judgment rule” as a general approach. According to this rule deference should be given to corporate decision-makers, in recognition of the risk and competition inherent in any competitive business environment.

The Supreme Court of Canada addressed the balance between deference and holding directors accountable for breaching their duty of care as follows:

In determining whether directors have acted in a manner that breached the duty of care, it is worth repeating that perfection is not demanded.  Courts are ill-suited and should be reluctant to second-guess the application of business expertise to the considerations that are involved in corporate decision making, but they are capable, on the facts of any case, of determining whether an appropriate degree of prudence and diligence was brought to bear in reaching what is claimed to be a reasonable business decision at the time it was made.

Corporate directors in Canada should be aware of the “reasonably prudent” duty of care they owe in making decisions on behalf of the corporation. Similarly, anyone seeking to advance a claim against a director personally should first consider whether the director’s conduct could be considered sufficiently unreasonable and imprudent to give rise to liability. As long as a director can demonstrate that they took care in reaching their decision, the courts will be deferential – even if the results for the corporation or other stakeholders were negative.

This blog post was written by Brett Hodgins, a member of the Commercial Litigation team.  He can be reached at 613-369-0379 or at brett.hodgins@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Business Law
By: 

Posted June 18, 2024

This is an update on my earlier blog posted in 2022 titled “New Requirements for Private Federal Corporations to Report Individuals with Significant Control Coming[...]
Blog |
Estate Litigation
By: 

Posted June 11, 2024

“For it is in giving that we receive.” –Francis of Assisi Many of us grew up hearing this mantra. Good people give back. Generous people[...]
Blog |
Real Estate
By: 
What is title? “Title” is a legal term for a person or company’s rights of ownership in a private property. This is different from a[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates, Business Law, Real Estate
By: 

Posted May 28, 2024

The recent announcement from the Federal Government regarding an increase in the capital gains inclusion rate for individuals, trusts, and corporations has sparked significant discussion.[...]
Blog |
Family Law
By: 
When couples part ways, the shared ownership of a matrimonial home often becomes a contentious issue. In Ontario, the law recognizes two forms of co-ownership:[...]
Blog |
Real Estate
By: 
If you are purchasing a home in Ontario, you likely know that you should retain a real estate lawyer to close the transaction for you.[...]
Brett Hodgins

Brett Hodgins

I practice primarily in corporate and commercial litigation, although I have represented clients on matters as diverse as employment issues, wrongful dismissals, estate disputes, landlord tenant matters, and real estate disputes. I have appeared on behalf of clients in the Ontario Superior Court and the Small Claims Court, the Federal Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal, and before various tribunals including the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Landlord and Tenant Board, and the Parole Board of Canada. I have represented a wide variety of businesses and individuals in my practice, and I am keenly aware of the stress and costs faced by clients engaging in any kind of litigation. My guiding principle in every matter is to achieve the best possible result as efficiently and expeditiously as possible so that clients can get on with their lives. Prior to joining Mann Lawyers I completed my articles and... Read More

Read More About Brett Hodgins

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.