Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin

Offers To Settle in Court: A Sensible Strategy to Family Law

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Offers To Settle in Court: A Sensible Strategy to Family Law

Posted June 4, 2019

The majority of family law cases that go to court end up agreeing to a settlement. One mechanism that can help parties get to a settlement more efficiently is the offer to settle itself.

Either party to family law litigation can make an offer to settle an ongoing case at any time during the court process. Parties are not limited to only one offer and are not required to make an offer that would settle all issues. Parties can make offers that have costs consequences, or do not, that are open for a specific period, or open until trial.

The rules around offers to settle are designed to encourage them. Even if there is a contentious or novel issue that really requires the court system to resolve, it’s often the case that the parties can resolve many of the other disputes between them, and limit the number of points where judicial intervention is required.

Rule 18 of the Family Law Rules provides structure around offers to settle, including making, accepting, and withdrawing offers. Beyond the language of the rule, lawyers will have an approach that will take into account both the goals of settling the case and setting up a strong argument on costs.

If a case or part of a case does not end up settling, offers to settle are relevant to the determination of costs. “Costs” means that after a motion or trial is heard, a court can order one party to pay a portion of the other party’s legal fees. One of several factors a court will look to is whether any reasonable offers to settle were made. If a party beats his or her offer in court, that will be a very significant point in a costs argument.

For an offer to have costs consequences, it must meet specific requirements set out in Rule 18 around timelines, and there are some requirements about the form of the offer. For example, it needs to be signed by both the party and the lawyer, and the terms should be severable to the extent that it’s possible to sever them so that an offer on one issue can be accepted without the other party having to accept the offer on another issue. Ultimately the court retains a lot of discretion in determining who pays costs and how much is ordered and on what kind of schedule.

If you have a matter in litigation, your lawyer will be discussing an offer to settle with you. It’s an essential part of a litigation strategy to have an aggressive and skillfully crafted offer so that it can be used to maximize a costs award down the road. Given that most cases will end up settling, it’s also just a sensible thing to do. Cases settle on specific terms, and drafting an offer to settle gives a party the opportunity to craft those terms, or at least start a conversation about them.

As most cases will settle, it makes sense to keep settlement negotiations going even as litigation proceeds. Offers to settle are a key part of both those settlement negotiations and litigation strategy for those cases that end up at a motion or trial.

If you need a lawyer for your settlement process or want advice regarding your offer of settlement, do not hesitate to reach out to our family lawyers here at Mann Lawyers.

This blog post was written by Jenny Johnston, a member of our Family Law team.  She can be reached at 613-566-2081 or at jenny.johnston@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Generally, the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”) has been interpreted to protect non-unionized employees from “temporary” lay offs unless their employment contract permits such a[...]
Blog |
Business Law

By: 

Posted October 20, 2021

On October 19, 2021, the new Ontario Business Registry System launched. This new online registry now enables businesses and not-for-profit corporations to directly access services[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law

By: 

Posted October 14, 2021

In the decision of Greenpeace Canada (2471256 Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks), 2021 ONSC 4521, released September 3, 2021,[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Posted October 1, 2021

This blog continues our exploration of the potential employment law consequences stemming from the degree of control a party exerts within a variety of business[...]
Blog |
Personal Injury

By: 

Posted September 27, 2021

Personal Injury lawyers and their clients are all too familiar with the carnage and suffering caused by impaired drivers.  Canada has the worst rate of[...]
Blog |
Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Business Law

By: 

Posted September 24, 2021

As is noted by the Court of Appeal in McEwen (Re), released August 12, 2021, referred to here as “Traders”, the BIA is a complete[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.