Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin

Transferring Assets into Joint Names and the Impact on Estate Planning

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Transferring Assets into Joint Names and the Impact on Estate Planning

By:

Posted January 22, 2019

There can be a variety of reasons why someone might choose to transfer a solely-held asset into joint names. For example, a child might be assisting a parent to manage their finances — the child is added to bank accounts or investment accounts or a parent thinks that since they will be giving their home to their child through their will, they might as well add them to title so the house can pass by right of survivorship and probate fees can be avoided.

There are legal implications of transferring assets into joint names, and it is essential to obtain legal advice before taking such a step. Consider, for example, the following scenarios:

  • A parent owns a secondary property that they plan to pass on to your child. The child is added to title (as joint tenants) so that if the parent dies, the house will pass to the child by right of survivorship. The child moves into the home and a few years later their significant other moves in too. They get married. The parent can no longer sell the home without the consent of the child’s spouse, as the home has become the couple’s marital home.  Sadly, after some time, the child and their spouse decide to separate. The child’s spouse has a claim against the equity in the home as a result of the breakdown of the marriage.
  • A parent requires assistance in managing their financial affairs, so they add their child to their investment account to make it easier to undertake transactions. The account is worth a substantial amount. Upon the parent’s death, the account passes to the child, by right of survivorship. The child claims it was the parent’s intention that the account be passed on to him/her while the siblings argue there was never an intention that the child would inherit the account to the exclusion of the other siblings. They become involved in expensive and divisive litigation over the matter.

Both of these scenarios could have been avoided with legal advice and proper planning.  While it might be desirable to try and avoid probate fees, or convenient to have someone assist in the managing of an account, the benefits do not always outweigh the drawbacks. While there are some cases in which transferring title into joint names may be appropriate, exercise caution and seek legal advice before making changes to title.

This blog post was written by Kate Wright, a member of the Family Law, Wills and Estates and Litigation teams.  She can be reached at 613-369-0383 or at kate.wright@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Generally, the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”) has been interpreted to protect non-unionized employees from “temporary” lay offs unless their employment contract permits such a[...]
Blog |
Business Law

By: 

Posted October 20, 2021

On October 19, 2021, the new Ontario Business Registry System launched. This new online registry now enables businesses and not-for-profit corporations to directly access services[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law

By: 

Posted October 14, 2021

In the decision of Greenpeace Canada (2471256 Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks), 2021 ONSC 4521, released September 3, 2021,[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Posted October 1, 2021

This blog continues our exploration of the potential employment law consequences stemming from the degree of control a party exerts within a variety of business[...]
Blog |
Personal Injury

By: 

Posted September 27, 2021

Personal Injury lawyers and their clients are all too familiar with the carnage and suffering caused by impaired drivers.  Canada has the worst rate of[...]
Blog |
Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Business Law

By: 

Posted September 24, 2021

As is noted by the Court of Appeal in McEwen (Re), released August 12, 2021, referred to here as “Traders”, the BIA is a complete[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.