Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Case Management Developments in Employment and Human Rights Matters

Case Management Developments in Employment and Human Rights Matters

Mann Lawyers

Posted January 16, 2019

Faced with delays, inefficiencies, and access to justice concerns, the Superior Court of Justice has just announced a pilot project, launching February 1, 2019, whereby parties may opt into a one-judge case management model.  Under this model, the same judge will be assigned to all case conferences, the pre-trial, and the trial of a matter.  Moreover, no motions will be scheduled without the permission of the overseeing judge.  A trial date will be fixed early, and a timeline put in place for completing steps leading up to it.  The judge is expected to assist in narrowing issues and preparing for trial.  The pilot program practice advisory notes that the expected benefits of one-judge case management are “the faster and less costly resolution of civil disputes.” The exception to the one-judge model is for case conferences meant to focus solely on resolution discussions.

In March 2018, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario launched a similar new case processing system, whereby an HRTO Vice-Chair is assigned to each application to deal with all adjudicative matters from the time an application is filed until it is closed, with the exception of mediation.  Their new system schedules one day for hearing at an early stage and mandates a case management conference call with the Vice-Chair assigned a month prior to the hearing.

The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal already has case management practices in place where a Tribunal Member oversees case management calls to manage preliminary issues leading up to a hearing, which that Member will also oversee.

Clearly this one-judge model is going to impact the management of employment and human rights cases moving forward.

Some have concerns about the neutrality of a decision maker going into trial or a hearing in the context of a one-judge model; however, in the labour model, it is very common for the same person to act as both mediator and arbitrator, failing resolution.  Moreover, the HRTO has successfully adopted a mediation-adjudication model, if parties consent.   The concerns about neutrality appear to have been overridden by the desire for a less contentious model of resolution, and for cost-effective outcomes.  These models go beyond the case management systems proposed and currently in place, where mediations are the exception to the one-judge model.

I predict that these models will increase accountability and efficiencies, and allow for more contextualized decision making.  The profession is often resistant to change; it will be interesting to see if the civil pilot project receives ample uptake, if it materially changes the way that parties prepare for trial, and if it encourages greater cooperation and increases likelihood of early resolution.

This blog post was written by Alayna Miller, a member of the Employment team.  She can be reached at 613-369-0374 or at

More Resources

Blog |
Business Law, Wills, Trusts and Estates


Posted June 28, 2022

As entrepreneurs, we tend to be optimistic people – that is what I have found, for the most part, and what seems to be part[...]
Blog |
Business Law


Posted June 20, 2022

The Federal Government of Canada recently launched the Canada Digital Adoption Program (“CDAP”) run by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (“ISED”). It is a[...]
Blog |
Estate Litigation


Posted June 13, 2022

Trust companies are often faced with a dilemma when the fees associated with the administration of a testamentary trust exceed the income generated by it. [...]
Blog |
Environmental Law


Posted June 6, 2022

On May 10, 2022, the Alberta Court of Appeal released its opinion in Reference re Impact Assessment Act (the “Act”), 2022 ABCA 165, on the[...]
Blog |
Personal Injury


Posted May 30, 2022

As the warm weather of summer approaches, the number of cyclists enjoying Ottawa’s shared path system is increasing day by day. I have noticed that[...]
Blog |
Family Law


Posted May 25, 2022

Cohabitation agreements and marriage contracts (or “prenups”) are common contracts for couples to enter into prior to moving in together or getting married. Reasons for[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.