COVID-19 and its Effect on Civil Litigation Matters

COVID-19 and its Effect on Civil Litigation Matters

By:

Posted April 2, 2020

While the Superior Court of Justice has suspended most hearings in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, recently released decisions show how the COVID-19 pandemic is already affecting civil litigation matters in the Province of Ontario.

One such decision is Lancaster Group Inc. v. Kenaidan Contracting Ltd. (2020 ONSC 1653), which was a decision on a motion for security for costs on a construction lien matter. While the motion was heard on November 18, 2019, the decision was released on March 20, 2020, after COVID-19 had been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization.

While much of the motion is a standard motion for security for costs, of relevance is the Court’s consideration of COVID-19, more specifically the economic impact of COVID-19, in its determination of what constitutes a just order in the circumstances.

While considering the appropriate quantum for security for costs, in addition to considering the existence of other actions, the Court considered what it described as the unknown impact of COVID-19 on the plaintiff, and ultimately ordered that the plaintiff did not have to pay the entire security for costs upfront, instead finding that a “pay-as-you-go” plan was appropriate.

It is interesting that the Court in this decision applied COVID-19 as a mitigating factor to the need for the plaintiff to post security for costs, instead of a factor making it necessary, given the economic instability that COVID-19 has created. However, as Judges possess significant discretion on motions for security for costs and the orders made under these motions, this decision is not conclusive that COVID-19 could not be considered and applied differently in a different matter.

Given that the motion was heard in November, the parties would not have advanced any argument relating to COVID-19. As such, it remains to be seen whether the existence of COVID-19, and its economic impact, could be found by a Court as a factor that may hinder a party’s ability to satisfy a costs award, and therefore strengthening a moving party’s motion for security for costs.

This blog post was written by Alexander Bissonnette, a member of the Commercial Litigation team.  He can be reached at 613-369-0358 or at [email protected].

More Resources

Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates
By: 

Posted March 6, 2026

Introduction: Lessons from a Recent BC Incident In January 2026, a routine landscaping project in Kamloops, British Columbia, became a cautionary tale for property owners[...]
Blog |
Business Law
By: 

Posted February 17, 2026

Franchises are an attractive business model in Canada, and with good reason: franchisees can start their own business with the added comfort of working within[...]
Blog |
Business Law
By: 

Posted February 10, 2026

Entering into a franchise relationship is a major business decision for both franchisors and franchisees, carrying long-term implications for everyone involved. Each party brings its[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates
By: 

Posted February 2, 2026

Cottages often carry decades of memories—but they also carry big estate planning risks, especially as property values skyrocket. A recent Ontario decision, Haddock v. Haddock,[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law
By: 

Posted January 27, 2026

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals,” are persistent synthetic compounds used in a variety of products, including firefighting foams, non-stick cookware,[...]
Blog |
Commercial Litigation
By: 

Posted January 20, 2026

The 2025 Ontario Court of Appeal decision of Gallant v Johnson (2025 ONCA 419) demonstrates the limitations of the Court to fix for the parties[...]
Alexander Bissonnette

Alexander Bissonnette

I am an Associate at Mann Lawyers and the Lead of the Firm’s Commercial Litigation Practice. My practice is dedicated exclusively to litigation, with a particular emphasis on commercial disputes. I have experience handling a broad range of litigation matters, including contractual disputes, collections (including enforcement), franchise disputes, shareholder and oppression matters, property and real estate disputes, and procurement disputes. I also have experience representing parties involved in insolvency matters, including receiverships and CCAA proceedings. In addition to my commercial litigation practice, I am a member of the firm’s Estate Litigation Group, where I handle disputes involving estates as well as power of attorney and guardianship matters. I articled with Mann Lawyers and was called to the Bar in 2017. I earned my law degree from Queen’s University in 2016, where I was actively involved with Queen’s Legal Aid, assisting students and Kingston residents with a variety of legal issues.... Read More

Read More About Alexander Bissonnette