CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Employer Obligations To Provide A Healthy Workplace: Keeping Harmful Rhetoric Out

Employer Obligations To Provide A Healthy Workplace: Keeping Harmful Rhetoric Out

By:

Mann Lawyers

Posted June 26, 2019

An employer has an obligation to provide a harassment-free and healthy work environment.  Ontario’s human rights legislation does not require an employee to be the direct target of a hateful or harmful religious-based comment at work in order to bring forth a complaint as it recognizes that a workplace that tolerates such comments can become a poisoned one.  The employment relationship is an area that legislation has afforded extra protection, as even if a comment would not constitute “hate speech,” it may still create a poisoned environment and constitute harassment in breach of the Human Rights Code: a course of vexatious comment or conduct that is known, or ought reasonably to be known, to be unwelcome.  A single instance of an offensive comment, such as labelling an employee a terrorist, or making an off-colour joke about someone’s religion may trigger a breach.

This type of rhetoric may emerge amongst employees in the workplace.   An employer can be held vicariously liable for the conduct of its own employees if it learns of harassing behaviour and condones it, or if someone in management imparts the harassing behaviour.  An employer thus has its own obligations in the process once the alleged offensive conduct comes to its attention or it ought to have known about it.  It should have a policy in place to address any concerns of harassment brought forth, including those that come to its attention informally.  It should treat the complaint seriously, engage it promptly, and take steps to ensure that the individual bringing forth the complaint is provided with a harassment-free work environment and is not subject to reprisal. Alternative dispute measures may be offered; however failing the agreement of all parties to participate, and absent a resolution in that forum, it may be necessary to investigate the concerns.  An employer should keep the employee apprised of steps taken to address the complaint and the outcome of it.

These matters should be dealt with promptly to ensure that employees understand that offensive and harassing comments will not be tolerated.  Again, an employer may wish to offer training in cultural competency or human rights as a preventative measure.

We have seen a troubling correlation between harmful rhetoric and an increase in hate crimes. An employer has an obligation to ensure that it does not foster or condone either.

This blog post, an adaptation of a Question and Answer with Dr. Helen Ofosu of I/O Advisory Services, was written by Alayna Miller, a member of the Employment team.  She can be reached at 613-369-0374 or at alayna.miller@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates
By: 
Life is unpredictable, and while it’s easy to assume that we will always be able to make our own decisions, there might come a time[...]
Blog |
Business Law, Environmental Law
By: 

Posted March 4, 2025

Environmental liability is a critical concern for sellers involved in property and business transactions. Without the right protections in place, unexpected liabilities can surface even[...]
Blog |
Commercial Litigation
By: 

Posted February 25, 2025

The 2024 decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Preiano v. Cirillo (2024 ONCA 206) provides valuable insight into the quantification of damages that[...]
Blog |
Not-for-Profit and Charity Law, Business Law
By: 
The board of directors of a corporation is its governing body, charged with high level management and supervision of the corporation.  While most boards are[...]
Blog |
Family Law
By: 

Posted January 30, 2025

In the recent judgment issued on December 17th, 2024, Justice Sharma of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice provides the legal profession with significant guidance[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights
By: 

Posted January 21, 2025

In cases involving terminations of employment, a very common issue is the amount of pay an employee is owed by their former employer after they’ve[...]