Employers With Fixed-Term Contracts, Beware!

Illustration of a man and a woman standing next to a large clipboard with a contract document. The woman is holding an oversized pen, symbolizing signing or drafting an agreement.

Employers With Fixed-Term Contracts, Beware!

By:

Posted October 31, 2024

Fixed-term employment contracts are agreements where an employee is hired for a specific period of time, and where the contract has a defined end date. As the contract says how long the employee will be working for the employer, there is generally no additional notice or termination pay given to an employee at the end of a fixed-term contract. Often fixed-term employment contracts will be used for short-term hiring, such as hiring students for a few months during breaks from school, hiring for a short-term project, or to cover another employee’s leave. But they can also be used for longer terms, and many can last for several years.

While fixed-term employment contracts can be beneficial in some cases, many issues can arise for employers who use fixed-term employment contracts, especially where the employee is being hired for a fixed-term that lasts for several months or years, and where the employee is terminated before the end date of their contract.

A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision provides some insight on what employers and employees should be weary of when working with fixed-term employment contracts:

In Kopyl v Losani Homes (1998) Ltd., 2024 ONCA 199, an employee was hired for a one year fixed-term contract and their employment was terminated after only six months of work. The employee claimed that they were entitled to termination pay as they had a fixed-term employment contract with an invalid termination clause.

The validity of the termination clause was not in dispute in this case as both the employer and the employee recognized that it offended the Employment Standards Act, 2000, and was void as a result. However, the parties disagreed about the amounts owing to the employee.

The Court of Appeal held that the employee was owed the compensation that they would have been paid until the end date in the contract because the termination clause in the contract was invalid and because they’d been terminated before the end of the fixed-term. This resulted in the employee receiving around six months’ worth of pay.

Kopyl is a helpful reminder about the challenges with fixed-term employment contracts and the importance of having valid termination clauses in employment agreements. While an employer can terminate a fixed-term contract without cause before the term is over, they may still have an obligation to pay the employee to the end of the contract if the contract does not have a valid termination clause. Where a fixed-term employment contract is for a longer period of time, this can result in the employer paying the employee significantly more than they had anticipated.

Employers who use fixed-term contracts should consider speaking with an employment lawyer to better understand the terms of their contract and the associated risks. Employees on fixed-term contracts should also consider speaking with an employment lawyer if they are terminated to ensure that they understand their entitlements and options.

This blog post was written by Lori Philpott, a member of the Employment Law team.   She can be reached at 613-369-0382 or at [email protected].

More Resources

Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates, Estate Administration
By: 

Posted June 3, 2026

Being named an estate trustee (commonly referred to as an executor) is often considered an honour; it reflects a high level of trust and confidence.[...]
Blog |
Real Estate
By: 

Posted May 26, 2026

Calling all Ontario homebuyers! In the excitement of purchasing your first home, relocating, or downsizing, it can be easy to lose track of critical legal[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates
By: 

Posted May 19, 2026

Q: As my parents’ Attorney for Personal Care, I am worried. My 92-year-old father and my 89-year-old mother live together in a single detached home,[...]
Blog |
Business Law
By: 

Posted May 13, 2026

In Ontario, under the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000 (the “Arthur Wishart Act”), franchisors are required to provide prospective franchisees a disclosure document, which[...]
Blog |
Commercial Litigation
By: 

Posted May 4, 2026

The 2025 Ontario Court of Appeal decision of Correa v. Valstar Homes (Oakville Sixth Line) Inc. (2025 ONCA 156), demonstrates that “time is of the[...]
Blog |
Family Law
By: 

Posted April 27, 2026

Damages for Tort Claims Related to Domestic Violence In a previous blog post, we reviewed the types of tort claims that may be raised in[...]
Lori Philpott

Lori Philpott

I am an associate in the firm’s Employment, Human Rights and Labour practice group. I advise employers and employees on a wide range of labour and employment matters including terminations, accommodations, workplace investigations, and workplace disputes. My practice is built on creative problem solving, open communication, and strategic advice. I understand that issues related to employment can be challenging for both employees and employers alike, and I take pride in helping clients resolve disputes and manage their employment relationships. I obtained a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in French Studies, a Certificate in Law, and a Juris Doctor degree from Queen’s University. After completing my Articles at a mid-sized Ottawa law firm, I worked as in-house counsel for a national union, and then joined Mann Lawyers as an associate. In law school, I volunteered with Queen’s Legal Aid, Family and Children’s Services, the Girl Guides, and ElderDog. I also am a... Read More

Read More About Lori Philpott