Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Excess Soils Management Rules – Phase 2 is Here

Excess Soils Management Rules – Phase 2 is Here

By:

Posted January 31, 2022

On January 1, 2022, the second stage of O. Reg. 406/19: On-Site and Excess Soil Management came into force.  The first stage of the regulation, which implemented rules for the reuse of soils and came into force on January 1, 2021, was the subject of an earlier blog found here.

The second stage of the regulation sets out the requirements for testing, tracking and registration of excess soils and who is responsible for these steps.  Much of the responsibility falls on the “project leader”.

Under the regulation, the “project leader” is defined as “the person or persons who are ultimately responsible for making decisions relating to the planning and implementation of the project.”  This definition is very broad, and not only attracts significant obligations under the regulation, but also the potential for liability where the requirements of the regulation are not met.

One of the noteworthy components of the regulation is the establishment of a requirement for the registration of notices and instruments related to soils.

It is the project leader who is responsible for ensuring that the required registration is filed in the Registry before excess soils are removed from the project area.  The filing must include the information required in Schedule 1 to the regulation.  There are certain exemptions to the registration requirement, set out in Schedule 2 to the regulation, including projects where the project leader entered into a contract with another person in respect of excess soils management prior to January 1, 2022.  Where registration is required, the project leader is also responsible for updating the filing with information about the soil receiving site, be it a Class 1 soil management site, a Class 2 soil management site, a reuse site, a local waste transfer facility or a landfilling site where the soil impacts exceed the regulated standard.

Even before the filing of the registration, the project leader is responsible for ensuring that the necessary technical reports are prepared by a qualified person (as defined in O. Reg. 153/04 – Records of Site Condition).  These reports include an assessment of past use, a sampling and analysis plan, a soil characterization report and a soil destination assessment report.  These reports relate to the assessment of the condition of the soils in the project area and the assessment of a suitable receiving site in accordance with the soil rules.  There are limited exceptions to these reporting requirements, however the exceptions do not apply if the project leader knows that the project area has been affected by a discharge of a contaminant.

In addition to these obligations, the project leader is also responsible for ensuring that an excess soil tracking system is implemented for the project.  The regulation requires the detailed tracking of information about the soils being removed from the project area, including information relating to the amount, quality and location of soils excavated and stockpiled, and also requires detailed tracking of information relating to the hauling of soils, including the date and location where soils were loaded and details about where and when the soils were deposited.  The regulation mandates that the hauler transporting the excess soils is required to have enumerated information available at all times during transport.

The project leader bears a large burden under the regulation.  This represents a significant change, as such a role did not previously exist.  Considerable thought will need to be given in the project planning stage as to who will take on that role, and whether it will be shared by more than one person.

This blog post was written by Cheryl Gerhardt McLuckie, a member of the Environmental Law team.  Cheryl can be reached at 613-369-0365 or at cheryl.mcluckie@mannlawyers.com.

 

More Resources

Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights, Commercial Litigation

By: 

Posted May 23, 2023

Both in my commercial and employment litigation practice, I encounter Ontario business owners faced with serious charges laid against them under the Provincial Offences Act[...]
Blog |
Family Law

By: 

Posted May 18, 2023

The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Anderson v. Anderson, 2023 SCC 13, provides guidance on domestic contracts and the enforceability of an informal[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law

By: 

Posted May 16, 2023

When many people think of contaminated sites, they think of the usual suspects such as industrial properties and gas stations.  They may not think of[...]
Blog |
Business Law

By: 

Posted May 9, 2023

Often business owners reach a point where they are considering the sale of their business either through the sale of shares or the sale of[...]
Blog |
Family Law

By: 

Posted May 2, 2023

Overview of Tort Claims in Family Matters Tort claims can be made in family law matters, so as to prevent a multiplicity of proceedings and[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Posted April 25, 2023

In a case that recently was decided from the Court of Appeal of Ontario called Celestini v Shoplogix Inc., 2023 ONCA 131, the Court had[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.