Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Nurture Over Nature: Evolution of Grandparents’ Rights in Court

Nurture Over Nature: Evolution of Grandparents’ Rights in Court

By:

Posted December 7, 2022

Grandparents often play a special role in the lives of children and sometimes even step in to support their grandchildren during tumultuous times like separation or divorce. But grandparents’ rights to have parenting time and decision-making rights or even contact have not always been well supported in law. However, over time, courts have moved away from emphasizing the closeness of a biological connection to a child when making parenting and contact determinations to instead considering their child’s overall best interests. This shift has meant that grandparents have more ability to apply for and succeed in parenting orders from the court.

In Ontario, grandparents’ rights are governed by either the Children’s Law Reform Act or the Divorce Act. The Children’s Law Reform Act applies where the child’s parents were never married or have decided to proceed by way of a separation rather than a divorce. The Divorce Act applies where the parents have already obtained a divorce or are seeking a divorce.

Grandparents’ rights under the Children’s Law Reform Act

Decision-making responsibility and parenting time/contact orders are regulated in the Children’s Law Reform Act, sections 19, 21, and 48. These provision state that while “any person” may apply for a parenting order, biological parents have a presumed preferred status or preferential claim over others, including grandparents.

However, courts have swayed from a strict interpretation of the legislation over time. Courts have moved from the “parental preference” doctrine to the more circumstantially sensitive “best interests of the child” doctrine. Consequently, the case law has made it clear that the best interests of a child is the primary concern in determining decision-making and contact with a child; the wishes of biological parents must give way to a consideration of the child’s welfare. This means that if it is in the child’s best interest for the grandparent to have decision-making responsibilities or contact, then courts will likely award that. The presumption in favour of biological parents is still there, but over time is being given less weight.

The Supreme Court succinctly summarized the overarching ethos behind the shift to the best interest of the child doctrine in R. (A.N.) v. W. (L.J.), [1983] 2 S.C.R. 173, 1 D. L.R. (4th) 193. In that case, the Court upheld the trial judge’s award of custody of a child to foster parents, which he based on the child’s best interests. Wilson J., delivering the judgment of the Court, stated:

This appeal emphasizes once more … that the law no longer treats children as property of those who gave them birth but focuses on what is in their best interest (para 174).

However, the love and care that biological parents may provide remain essential to consider in assessing the child’s best interests.

Grandparents’ rights under the Divorce Act

There has been a similar evolution in grandparents’ ability to assert decision-making and parenting time under the Divorce Act. However, the Divorce Act makes it slightly more complicated for grandparents to get an order from the court. In March 2021, significant changes were made to the Divorce Act, which strengthened the child’s best interests test and highlighted the importance of considering the child’s relationship with parents, grandparents, and other significant people in the child’s life.

However, for the grandparents to apply to the court to get a parenting order or even a contact order, they need the permission of the court to apply under s 16.1 (3) and 16.5 (3). This adds an extra barrier for non-parents to make applications for children. Once leave of the court is given, and a grandparent, for example, is allowed to apply, the court will then consider the role the grandparents have played in the child’s life via the best interest of the child analysis. Courts are careful not to overvalue the grandparent’s perceived maturity because of age or increased parenting experience. Instead, they focus on the strength and familiarity of the child with the grandparent and the role the grandparent has played in the child’s life up until now. Courts are hesitant to make parenting awards for grandparents who wish to have a close relationship with their grandchild. Typically, the relationship must already be established.

Courts are moving away from a strict presumption in favour of the child’s parents. However, grandparents still face additional barriers in getting court orders for parenting time, decision making and even contact.

This blog post was written by Articling Student Maggie Casey and  Kate Wright, a member of the Family Law, Wills and Estates and Estate Litigation teams.  Kate can be reached at 613-369-0383 or at kate.wright@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights, Commercial Litigation

By: 

Posted May 23, 2023

Both in my commercial and employment litigation practice, I encounter Ontario business owners faced with serious charges laid against them under the Provincial Offences Act[...]
Blog |
Family Law

By: 

Posted May 18, 2023

The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Anderson v. Anderson, 2023 SCC 13, provides guidance on domestic contracts and the enforceability of an informal[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law

By: 

Posted May 16, 2023

When many people think of contaminated sites, they think of the usual suspects such as industrial properties and gas stations.  They may not think of[...]
Blog |
Business Law

By: 

Posted May 9, 2023

Often business owners reach a point where they are considering the sale of their business either through the sale of shares or the sale of[...]
Blog |
Family Law

By: 

Posted May 2, 2023

Overview of Tort Claims in Family Matters Tort claims can be made in family law matters, so as to prevent a multiplicity of proceedings and[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Posted April 25, 2023

In a case that recently was decided from the Court of Appeal of Ontario called Celestini v Shoplogix Inc., 2023 ONCA 131, the Court had[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.