Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

The Impact of Delay When Making a Claim for Spousal Support

The Impact of Delay When Making a Claim for Spousal Support

By:

Posted December 16, 2019

Both married and common-law spouses may be entitled to support following the breakdown of a relationship.  While other claims in family law are subject to limitation periods (for example, a claim for equalization of property), there is no limitation period for bringing a claim for spousal support under either the Family Law Act or Divorce Act.  While there is no limitation period barring a claim for spousal support, considerable delay in making a claim for support may result in the claim being dismissed.

How delay will be considered and treated will depend on the specific facts of each case.  The case law, however, sets out the factors to be considered when determining a claim for spousal support in the face of delay.

In Fyfe v. Jouppien, the court was tasked with assessing a claim for spousal support six years following separation.  The parties, in that case, had been married for eighteen years.   In the decision, Chappel J. stated that:

“[E]xcessive delay in seeking spousal support by a party may raise questions as to whether there was an ongoing reasonable expectation of support, and whether there was actual need on the part of the claimant spouse”.

In the Fyfe case, the parties agreed that the claimant of spousal support did not have any entitlement to support at the time of separation but the circumstances had changed resulting in a finding that the claimant was now entitled to support on a needs basis.

Some of the factors the court will consider when deciding whether to grant a claim for spousal support in the face of delay are as follows:

  1. Financial need arising after separation;
  2. Financial interdependence, both before and particularly after separation; and
  3. The length of the delay in making the claim.

Other decisions have suggested that delay should not affect a claim for support, provided that there is a compelling reason for the delay in bringing the claim.

While the delay in bringing a claim for support is not a bar to support and there are many cases in which support has been ordered notwithstanding delay, one should not put off bringing a claim.  As previously noted, each case will turn on its own specific facts and delay may increase the possibility that a claim will be dismissed.

This blog post was written by Kate Wright, a member of the Family Law, Wills and Estates and Litigation teams.  She can be reached at 613-369-0383 or at kate.wright@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights, Commercial Litigation

By: 

Posted May 23, 2023

Both in my commercial and employment litigation practice, I encounter Ontario business owners faced with serious charges laid against them under the Provincial Offences Act[...]
Blog |
Family Law

By: 

Posted May 18, 2023

The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Anderson v. Anderson, 2023 SCC 13, provides guidance on domestic contracts and the enforceability of an informal[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law

By: 

Posted May 16, 2023

When many people think of contaminated sites, they think of the usual suspects such as industrial properties and gas stations.  They may not think of[...]
Blog |
Business Law

By: 

Posted May 9, 2023

Often business owners reach a point where they are considering the sale of their business either through the sale of shares or the sale of[...]
Blog |
Family Law

By: 

Posted May 2, 2023

Overview of Tort Claims in Family Matters Tort claims can be made in family law matters, so as to prevent a multiplicity of proceedings and[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Posted April 25, 2023

In a case that recently was decided from the Court of Appeal of Ontario called Celestini v Shoplogix Inc., 2023 ONCA 131, the Court had[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.