Examinations of Corporate Parties – Who is the mouth piece?

Examinations of Corporate Parties – Who is the mouth piece?

By:

Mann Lawyers

Posted March 28, 2018

When a corporation is a party to litigation in Ontario, a corporate representative is put forward to be examined for discovery on behalf of the corporation. During the examination, the corporate representative is required to answer not only “on their own knowledge”, but also on information and belief.

Recently, in Cimtel Inc. v TSV Holdings Ltd. 2018 ONSC 894, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice examined whether a witness who is being examined for discovery on behalf of a corporation is obliged to answer questions within his or her personal knowledge, regardless of whether that knowledge was acquired by the individual in his or her capacity as an officer, director or employee of that corporation or in some other capacity.

The Court noted that the corporate representative is the “mouthpiece” of the corporation, and it is the knowledge, information and belief of the corporation on which an adverse party is entitled to examine.

Where the corporate representative has not been named personally as a defendant, or where the corporate representative’s knowledge was gained while he or she was associated with another corporation not named as a corporate defendant in the litigation, the corporate representative must only answer relevant questions with knowledge gained in his or her capacity as a director, officer or employee of the corporate party, or by informing him or herself from other employees of the corporation or from corporate records.  The Court found that to permit otherwise would result in the adverse party being able to obtain on discovery the knowledge of a non-party without leave, contrary to Rule 31.10 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

A corporate representative should inform him or herself from corporate records or from other employees, and the corporation is required to make reasonable inquiries of third parties.  The Court noted that, to the extent that the corporate representative has personal knowledge relevant to the action which the corporate defendant would be required to disclose on discovery in any event, barring some unfairness, it would be more efficient to permit the corporate defendant to provide his or her personal knowledge while being examined for discovery as the corporate representative.  It would be open to the corporate defendant to clarify his or her evidence by testifying as to when and how he or she acquired the personal knowledge and the extent to which he or she communicated that knowledge to any officer or employee of the corporation.

Shauna Cant is a member of the Commercial Litigation team. She can be reached at 613-369-0359 or at shauna.cant@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates, Estate Litigation
By: 

Posted July 10, 2025

When Mrs. Crumb became estranged from two of her four children, she reportedly cut them out of her Will. However, she had already designated all[...]
Blog |
Real Estate
By: 
If you’re a first-time home buyer in Canada, navigating rising prices and high interest rates can feel overwhelming. That said, there is some good news.[...]
Blog |
Family Law
By: 

Posted June 24, 2025

When a marriage or common law relationship breaks down, parents must determine how they will make decisions for their children (joint or sole decision-making) and[...]
Blog |
Estate Litigation
By: 
June 15 marks World Elder Abuse Awareness Day, a time to raise awareness about the prevalence of elder abuse, and remind and empower everyone to[...]
Blog |
Estate Litigation, Wills, Trusts and Estates
By: 
When Mr. D’Onofrio died at the age of 43, he left behind a common law partner, an ex-wife and three children. He also left behind[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law
By: 
In our previous blog, “Canada’s Final State of PFAS Report Reveals 100+ Federal Contaminated Sites—Is Your Property at Risk?”, we reviewed the federal government’s March[...]