Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Occupation Rent

Occupation Rent

By:

Mann Lawyers

Posted June 11, 2018

After separation, if one spouse remains living in a jointly owned property or matrimonial home for some period of time, while the other spouse pays rent elsewhere, should the occupying spouse pay some amount of money in rent to the one who has decamped?

The right to occupation rent may be grounded in section 24(c) of the Family Law Act for married spouses where the spouse remaining in the home has a court order for exclusive possession, or on the basis of the common law and the discretion of the court. The mere fact that one spouse remained in the property after separation does not guarantee success on this type of claim.

Facts and factors matter in occupation rent claims. The courts will look to the conduct of both spouses (including any failure to pay support), the duration of sole occupancy, the ability (or inability) of the non-occupying spouse to access his or her equity in the property, competing claims in the litigation, and amounts that the occupying spouse has paid towards the mortgage or other costs of the house.

The court will also look to factors such as whether the occupying spouse failed to keep the property in good condition (thus potentially reducing the value of the property between separation and sale), and whether the non-occupying spouse was required to leave because of domestic violence charges.

Overall the court must examine whether it is reasonable and equitable to order occupation rent, given all the facts of a given case. It is the job of the non-occupying spouse to convince a court that occupation rent should be ordered.

The case law in this area confirms that even if occupation rent is ordered, the quantum may be far less than 50% of fair market rent for a variety of reasons, including the separation itself taking the occupying spouse by surprise (see: Erb v. Erb, [2003] O.J. No. 1527, at paragraphs 71 – 78).

Whatever stage of a separation one is at, this issue should be given due consideration, ideally within the wider context of the shared responsibility for ongoing expenses from the date of separation until a final settlement or trial.

This blog post was written by Jenny Johnston, a member of our Family Law team.  She can be reached at 613-566-2081 or at jenny.johnston@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Business Law
By: 
Can the use of a “thumbs-up” emoji in a text message create legally binding obligations? Last summer’s decision by the Saskatchewan Court of King’s Bench,[...]
Blog |
Real Estate
By: 

Posted June 26, 2024

A 2023 Ontario Superior Court case, Lake v Cambridge (City), 2023 ONSC 5200, confirmed that a purchaser is entitled to complete a transfer relying on[...]
Blog |
Business Law
By: 

Posted June 18, 2024

This is an update on my earlier blog posted in 2022 titled “New Requirements for Private Federal Corporations to Report Individuals with Significant Control Coming[...]
Blog |
Estate Litigation
By: 

Posted June 11, 2024

“For it is in giving that we receive.” –Francis of Assisi Many of us grew up hearing this mantra. Good people give back. Generous people[...]
Blog |
Real Estate
By: 
What is title? “Title” is a legal term for a person or company’s rights of ownership in a private property. This is different from a[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates, Business Law, Real Estate
By: 

Posted May 28, 2024

The recent announcement from the Federal Government regarding an increase in the capital gains inclusion rate for individuals, trusts, and corporations has sparked significant discussion.[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.