Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin

Skills Sets # 12: Beware the Bear 

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Skills Sets # 12: Beware the Bear 

By:

Posted November 6, 2020

Interview, who’s interviewing who/ Are you interviewing me/ Or am I interviewing you   Cyndi Lauper

The art of interviewing a prospective client, a skill central to our business and performance, must be included in the support and training provided to our students, new associates and junior colleagues.

Because there are many ways to conduct an interview, there is no perfect way.   Our associates, with our assistance, need to develop their own way.  As all commentators agree, no one interview will be the same.  The relevance of circumstances, needs, dispositions, thin skulls, issues, solutions and applicable laws will differ, even in cookie cutter practices (if there is such a thing).

In 1979 the late Morris Schumiatcher published his classic Man of Law, A Model in which he described his assessment of a modern (cosmopolitan?) lawyer.  If you can find this book, it is an entertaining read. Not perhaps to all tastes, but certainly to mine.  It reminds me today that in conducting an interview a lawyer exercises many different muscles. One of them surely is knowledge and understanding of the subject matter.  Another is the ability to listen constructively. A third is the wisdom to differentiate between what is important and what is not.  Yet another is the patience to lead the process smoothly and carefully, without seeming to control it, all the while watching for body language and listening for distress or other motivators or inhibitors. Yet another again is judgment. Fundamentally, the interviewer must understand the difference between the client’s motivation, and the client’s objectives, what to do with that knowledge and when to do it. Subtle perhaps, but keenly important.

People with (or without) problems are mosaics composed of different parts.  In the interview the lawyer must be attuned to all of them. It is not an easy thing to conduct a suitable interview (by which we mean, an interview that will stand the test of time). And as many commentators note, it is the first, and therefore foundational interview that in particular sets the stage for everything that follows, including the nature of the relationship with the client that will unfold.  That relationship too is fundamental.  As we all recognize, clients are people with problems who believe that we have a solution; who will look to us and rely upon us.

Beware the Bear

The interviewer must not only be sure to distinguish between the clients motivation and objectives, but at the right time must necessarily apply a humble realism to what can or cannot be achieved, to what is or is not reasonable.  It is at this point that the interview becomes a mix of interviewing and counseling.

In this respect, the interview is the warm up; counselling is the pitch. Primary components of counseling are advising, recommending and advocating.  It is what the client after all is interested in and the training, knowledge and experience is what we bring to the table, what we are selling. The only thing that the client will put higher than counseling is achievement of the client’s objective, but counseling is the key.

Recall the distinction between motivation and objective.  Objective is what the client wants.  Motivation is why the client wants it.  Understanding both are of equal importance to the lawyer. But to the client, motivation and attaining the objective are rivals.  In the race for relevance, the client’s objective wins by a mile. The client’s motivation may not be entirely understood by the client, but the client’s objective is a fixation. This must not be lost on the interviewer.

This brings me to an admittedly simplistic, but relevant analogy.

I do not understand the motivation of those who hunt bear, or any other game, for sport. But I accept that they are motivated, and while their motivation may again be complex, their objective is clear. What interests me is what is happening when a hunter in pursuit of a bear, shoots instead a human.

While each hunting accident is different, and other factors may apply, there is no doubt that a hunter’s brain is fixed on the objective, which is to see and then shoot at a bear.  But as science confirms, it is not the eyes that see in the final analysis. It is the brain alone that takes the image which the eyes enable and makes something of it. What the brain “sees” in these incidents is biased by what the brain hopes to see. “If you expect or want to see something that is what you are likely to see”.

The brain of every client that both we and our younger colleagues will work with, “sees” what it wants to see.

What is more, the hunter’s brain hears what it wants to hear. Like the eyes, “the ears are a delivery system, but the brain is the true workhorse, responsible for turning a jumble of noise into coherent messaging”.  And so, the brain of every client that both we and our younger colleagues work with, also “hears” what it wants to hear.

This phenomenon is part of the challenge in the interview and counseling of clients. We must assist our younger colleagues to recognize and address it.  For thoughts on this, please stay tuned for part II of this blog.

This blog post was written by  K. Scott McLean,  General Counsel and Director of Practice Management.  He can be reached at (613) 369-0375 or at scott.mclean@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Generally, the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”) has been interpreted to protect non-unionized employees from “temporary” lay offs unless their employment contract permits such a[...]
Blog |
Business Law

By: 

Posted October 20, 2021

On October 19, 2021, the new Ontario Business Registry System launched. This new online registry now enables businesses and not-for-profit corporations to directly access services[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law

By: 

Posted October 14, 2021

In the decision of Greenpeace Canada (2471256 Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks), 2021 ONSC 4521, released September 3, 2021,[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Posted October 1, 2021

This blog continues our exploration of the potential employment law consequences stemming from the degree of control a party exerts within a variety of business[...]
Blog |
Personal Injury

By: 

Posted September 27, 2021

Personal Injury lawyers and their clients are all too familiar with the carnage and suffering caused by impaired drivers.  Canada has the worst rate of[...]
Blog |
Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Business Law

By: 

Posted September 24, 2021

As is noted by the Court of Appeal in McEwen (Re), released August 12, 2021, referred to here as “Traders”, the BIA is a complete[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.