Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Taking them at their word? The validity of verbal contracts

Taking them at their word? The validity of verbal contracts

Mann Lawyers

Posted May 7, 2018

Ramsay v BCE Inc.

The Toronto Small Claims Court recently found that a telephone conversation between an individual consumer and Bell Canada constitutes a legally enforceable oral contract – one which cannot be superseded by written terms emailed after the fact.

In David Ramsay v BCE Inc. the Plaintiff Mr. Ramsay called Bell Canada and ultimately purchased internet and television services for a term of 24 months. Having reached an agreement by phone, Bell Canada then sent Mr. Ramsay an email containing new terms including an increased price and an entire agreement clause.

Deputy Judge De Lucia found that when the telephone conversation concluded, a contract was in place with all of the essential elements, including consideration and sufficiently clear terms. Bell Canada’s later attempt to unilaterally raise the agreed-upon price was thus in violation of a valid and enforceable contract.  A party to a contract cannot unilaterally insert new terms without fresh consideration.  Where new terms involve price increases, any attempt to unilaterally change the verbal contract will be considered high handed and unacceptable by the Court.

The Court explained that while Bell Canada has the commercial right to impose price changes, it cannot do so during a contractual term.  The term in this case was 24 months, as agreed upon verbally between the parties.  Bell Canada’s attempt to clarify, introduce and bring attention to the new terms of the contract through subsequent emails was held to be unacceptable.  Given that none of the new terms were part of the original contract, they were found to be unenforceable.

Implications for Commercial Parties

Even though the damages award was low, the Small Claims Court’s reasoning should provide a caution to companies that engage consumers by telephone.  If your company contracts over the phone, it may not be possible to supersede the terms of the initial verbal contract with subsequent written terms.

For the sake of clarity and consistency, it is always best practice to reduce contracts to writing.  This holds especially true for companies that regularly contract with individual consumers. Employees who engage consumers by telephone should be trained to ensure best practices are followed at every consumer interaction.  Ensuring contracting protocols are followed at each consumer interaction will reduce the likelihood of unexpected terms or liability for the corporation in the future.

Shauna Cant is a member of the Commercial Litigation team. She can be reached at 613-369-0359 or at

More Resources

Blog |
Business Law, Wills, Trusts and Estates


Posted June 28, 2022

As entrepreneurs, we tend to be optimistic people – that is what I have found, for the most part, and what seems to be part[...]
Blog |
Business Law


Posted June 20, 2022

The Federal Government of Canada recently launched the Canada Digital Adoption Program (“CDAP”) run by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (“ISED”). It is a[...]
Blog |
Estate Litigation


Posted June 13, 2022

Trust companies are often faced with a dilemma when the fees associated with the administration of a testamentary trust exceed the income generated by it. [...]
Blog |
Environmental Law


Posted June 6, 2022

On May 10, 2022, the Alberta Court of Appeal released its opinion in Reference re Impact Assessment Act (the “Act”), 2022 ABCA 165, on the[...]
Blog |
Personal Injury


Posted May 30, 2022

As the warm weather of summer approaches, the number of cyclists enjoying Ottawa’s shared path system is increasing day by day. I have noticed that[...]
Blog |
Family Law


Posted May 25, 2022

Cohabitation agreements and marriage contracts (or “prenups”) are common contracts for couples to enter into prior to moving in together or getting married. Reasons for[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.