Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin

Are Growth and Practicality Coming to Ontario? Key Corporate Implications from Ontario’s Bill 213, Better for People, Smarter for Business Act, 2020

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Are Growth and Practicality Coming to Ontario? Key Corporate Implications from Ontario’s Bill 213, Better for People, Smarter for Business Act, 2020

By:

Posted December 8, 2020

On December 3, 2020, Bill 213, Better for People, Smarter for Business Act, 2020 (Bill 213), officially entered the Third Reading and was subjected to a deferred vote. This omnibus bill seeks to amend many pieces of legislation and establishes new universities within the province. In relation to corporate law, Bill 213 introduces important amendments to both Ontario’s Business Corporations Act (“OBCA”) and the Personal Property Security Act (“PPSA”).

OBCA

Pursuant to schedule 1, Bill 213 proposes two key amendments to the OBCA. First, under section 118(3), the OBCA currently requires that 25% of directors of a corporation be resident Canadians. Furthermore, if a corporation has less than 4 directors, at least one of them must be a resident Canadian. This applies to all OBCA corporations, except for non-resident corporations. Bill 213 would repeal section 118(3) of the OBCA entirely. This amendment has regularly been regarded as a crucially needed step forward to growing the investment pool for the province’s economy as it would increase the ability of foreign investors to exercise control over Ontario corporations.

Second, under section 104(1) of the OBCA, written shareholder resolutions, in lieu of resolutions voted in person, require unanimous approval of those shareholders entitled to vote. Bill 213 acknowledges the difficulty of obtaining unanimous written shareholder consent by proposing to reduce this stringent requirement for non-offering corporations. Bill 213 would amend section 104(1) to only require a majority of shareholders entitled to vote to approve written resolutions for non-offering corporations. However, all of the shareholders entitled to vote who did not partake in the written resolution approval would still need to be notified of the resolution, in writing, within 10 business days of said resolution. To help clarify this amendment further, Bill 213 would amend the OBCA so that the legislation expressly outlines that only ordinary (not special) resolutions are required for amending/repealing bylaws, electing/removing directors, and appointing/replacing auditors as well as fixing the compensation for said auditors.

PPSA

Under schedule 20, Bill 213 introduces an interesting new power for the registrar to reject or discharge “vexatious registrations” under the new section 66.1 of the PPSA. Vexatious registrations are defined as registrations by individuals who attempt to register a security interest for the sole purpose of annoying/harassing the debtor named in the document, and the registrant does not hold the security instrument mentioned in the document or is claiming an interest that is not registrable.

Importantly, the registrar alone would have the power to reject a vexatious registration. However, a discharge could be completed by the registrar under the registrar’s own volition or through a written request brought to the registrar by “any person who is affected by the [vexatious] registration.” If the registrar decided to reject or discharge (or not discharge) a vexation registration, the registrar would have provide written notice of their decision to the affected party. The written notice must also inform the affected party that said party has the right to appeal the decision at issue to the Divisional Court within 14 days of receiving the written notice from the registrar.

Considerations

As the corporate bar eagerly awaits the legislature’s decision on Bill 213, one thing is clear. If Bill 213 passes the Third Reading and receives Royal Assent, Ontario’s corporate landscape is likely to change. This could be seen through increased foreign investment, expedited corporate decision making, and/or filtered PPSA registration designed to weed out vexatious registrations.

Thank you to Articling Student Filip Szadurski for writing this blog.  Andre Martin is a Partner in the Business Law team.  Andre can be reached at 613-369-0370 or at andre.martin@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Business Law

By: 

Posted October 20, 2021

On October 19, 2021, the new Ontario Business Registry System launched. This new online registry now enables businesses and not-for-profit corporations to directly access services[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law

By: 

Posted October 14, 2021

In the decision of Greenpeace Canada (2471256 Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks), 2021 ONSC 4521, released September 3, 2021,[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Posted October 1, 2021

This blog continues our exploration of the potential employment law consequences stemming from the degree of control a party exerts within a variety of business[...]
Blog |
Personal Injury

By: 

Posted September 27, 2021

Personal Injury lawyers and their clients are all too familiar with the carnage and suffering caused by impaired drivers.  Canada has the worst rate of[...]
Blog |
Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Business Law

By: 

Posted September 24, 2021

As is noted by the Court of Appeal in McEwen (Re), released August 12, 2021, referred to here as “Traders”, the BIA is a complete[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates

By: 

Posted September 23, 2021

In-Trust For Accounts have become a common way for parents and grandparents to set aside money to finance their children or grandchildren’s post-secondary education. A[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.