Considering Occupation Rent

Considering Occupation Rent

By:

Mann Lawyers

Posted April 5, 2022

Occupation rent arises when the person who remains in the home is required to pay rent to the person who left the home to compensate the vacating party.

It is a particularly tricky area of family law and is often raised as a means to combat claims for post-separation adjustments sought to compensate a spouse for carrying costs.

 It is important to note that occupation rent is not available to every person who moves out of his or her home after separation. A court has jurisdiction to order a party to pay occupation rent if it is reasonable and equitable to do so; such an Order is made at the discretion of the court.

If a Court wishes to make an Order for occupation rent under the Family Law Act, that Court must order exclusive possession of a home to one spouse before making an Order that the spouse in possession pay rent. Note: this claim is only available to married spouses.

Courts have held that an order for exclusive possession under s. 24(1)(c) of the Family Law Act should only be granted ‘cautiously and in exceptional circumstances.’ Within the family law context the following factors are to be taken into account:

  1. The conduct of the non-occupying spouse, such as the failure to pay support;
  2. The conduct of the occupying spouse, such as the failure to pay support;
  3. Which spouse paid the mortgage and other carrying charges of the home;
  4. Any delay in making the claim;
  5. The extent or impact the non-occupying spouse has faced as a result of having been prevented from accessing his or her equity in the home;
  6. Whether the non-occupying spouse moved for the sale of the home and, if not, why;
  7. Whether children resided with the occupying spouse and, if so, whether the non-occupying spouse paid, or was able to pay, child support; and
  8. Whether the occupying spouse has increased the selling value of the property.

One spouse asking or badgering the other to leave is not a factor considered in this analysis.

Courts may also make an Order for occupation rent as a common law remedy, which does not require the pre-requisite Order for exclusive possession. This branch of relief is available to married and unmarried spouses alike. The Court must consider the same factors regardless of which branch of law they are applying.

This blog post was written by a former member of the Family Law team.  For further information, please email [email protected].

 

 

More Resources

Blog |
Estate Litigation, Wills, Trusts and Estates
By: 

Posted June 15, 2026

Each year on June 15, communities around the world recognize World Elder Abuse Awareness Day, a time to raise awareness about a deeply concerning and[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates, Estate Administration
By: 

Posted June 3, 2026

Being named an estate trustee (commonly referred to as an executor) is often considered an honour; it reflects a high level of trust and confidence.[...]
Blog |
Real Estate
By: 

Posted May 26, 2026

Calling all Ontario homebuyers! In the excitement of purchasing your first home, relocating, or downsizing, it can be easy to lose track of critical legal[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates
By: 

Posted May 19, 2026

Q: As my parents’ Attorney for Personal Care, I am worried. My 92-year-old father and my 89-year-old mother live together in a single detached home,[...]
Blog |
Business Law
By: 

Posted May 13, 2026

In Ontario, under the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000 (the “Arthur Wishart Act”), franchisors are required to provide prospective franchisees a disclosure document, which[...]
Blog |
Commercial Litigation
By: 

Posted May 4, 2026

The 2025 Ontario Court of Appeal decision of Correa v. Valstar Homes (Oakville Sixth Line) Inc. (2025 ONCA 156), demonstrates that “time is of the[...]
Michelle Williams

Michelle Williams

I graduated with undergraduate degrees in both Criminology and Family Studies from the University of Western Ontario and went on to obtain my law degree from Queen’s University in 2018. I articled at a mid-sized family law firm in the Greater Toronto Area. After being called to the bar in 2019, I worked at a multiservice firm in Oshawa, Ontario, where I gained ample courtroom experience. I have worked on appeal matters and argued numerous motions both in person and in writing. During the unprecedented court closures in the spring of 2020, I continued to work without pause. I have successfully argued numerous urgent motions that have helped to shape how Ontario courts address family matters such as parenting time, international travel, and children in crisis during COVID-19. Much of my practice following my call to the bar has been comprised of high conflict parenting disputes. This expanded my skills in... Read More

Read More About Michelle Williams