CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Digging Deeper into Ontario’s Proposed Soil Regulation Amendments

Digging Deeper into Ontario’s Proposed Soil Regulation Amendments

By:

Posted January 2, 2025

On October 18, 2024, the Ontario Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (the “MECP”) proposed further amendments to Ontario Regulation 406/19 – On-Site and Excess Soil Management (the “Excess Soil Regulation”) and the Rules for Soil Management and Excess Soil Quality Standards (the “Soil Rules”) under the Environmental Protection Act (the “EPA”), aiming to streamline and make it more affordable for contractors and municipalities to reuse more excess soil locally.

The proposed amendments are available here and summarized below:

Landfill Prohibition Delayed To January 1, 2027

Section 22 of the Excess Soil Regulation prohibits disposing excess soil at landfills and dumpsites after January 1, 2025. The proposed amendments would extend this prohibition date to January 1, 2027, and provide an exemption where a Qualified Person issues a declaration that:

  1. The excess soil contains a parameter for which there is no applicable excess soil quality standard and there is reasonable grounds to believe the final placement of the excess soil at a reuse site may cause an adverse effect
  2. The excess soil contains invasive species that should not be relocated, or
  3. Reuse of the excess soil at a reuse site for structural purposes is not possible due to its geotechnical instability and a reuse site that may use the soil for other beneficial purposes has not been located after reasonable efforts.

Waste Environmental Compliance Approval Exemptions

The proposed amendments expand on a 2023 MECP proposal (ERO notice #019-7636), exempting certain Class 1 soil management sites, such as aggregate reuse and small liquid soil depots, from the requirement for a waste Environmental Compliance Approval. Instead, these sites would subject to specific operational rules outlined in the Excess Soil Regulation.

Improved Reuse Of Aggregate And Stormwater Pond Sediment

The proposed amendments would offer greater flexibility in soil quality standards for excess soil used in engineered aggregates or stormwater management pond sediment, particularly when reused in infrastructure projects. This flexibility in respect of these standards would apply specifically to asphalt-related contaminants and naturally occurring exceedances.

Enhanced Reuse Of Soil Between Similar Infrastructure Projects

The changes would simplify the reuse of excess soil in similar infrastructure projects, such as road-to-road projects, by allowing soil transfers between project areas and reuse sites managed by the same project leader under specified conditions. These transfers would be exempt from sections 3 to 5 of the Excess Soil Regulation, which typically govern excess soil quality standards and waste designations.

Streamlined Reuse Planning Requirements For Excess Soil Between Infrastructure Projects

The proposed amendments would exempt project leaders from certain reuse planning requirements when transferring excess soil between infrastructure sites. These include past use assessments, sampling and analysis plans and reports, excess soil destination assessment reports and associated tracking systems, as long as both sites are infrastructure-related. Unlike the current exemption, which applies only when the reuse site is owned by the project leader or a public body, the new rules allow for flexibility regardless of ownership, as long as both sites are infrastructure projects.

In-Situ Sampling for Stormwater Management Pond Sediment

In-situ sampling and testing of stormwater management pond sediment would be allowed under the proposed amendments, streamlining the compliance process. This method would adhere to the sampling frequencies specified in the Excess Soil Regulation.

Regional Mapping Of Naturally Occurring Background Concentrations

The MECP is exploring the possibility of regional mapping to mark areas with naturally occurring soil concentrations that exceed the soil excess standards, streamlining soil reuse by removing the need for individual site assessments. Currently, the Soil Rules allow excess soil with naturally occurring exceedances to meet the applicable excess soil quality standards for a reuse site if a Qualified Person can show it has a parameter that does not exceed local background levels.

The MECP is consulting further on the feasibility of regional mapping before implementation.

Further Clarifications and Amendments

The proposed amendments include minor clarifications to improve excess soil management, including:

  1. Streamlined soil reuse within project areas, allowing temporarily stored off-site soil to return without triggering the reuse planning requirements under sections 3 to 5 of the Excess Soil Regulation, provided it is not mixed with soil from other projects or materials. Relocation within a project area, even to areas that are not contiguous, would be treated as if the soil never left the project area
  2. Excess soil used temporarily in development, such as temporary driveways or access roads, need not meet excess soil quality standards under sections 3 to 5 of the Excess Soil Regulation if relocated upon project completion and free from contamination
  3. Clarifications addressing the inclusion of substances like conditioning agents for soil excavation and transportation in soil sampling plans, ensuring these substances are documented in analysis results and safety reports
  4. Proposed decreases in the sampling frequency for contaminants that are not of potential concern associated with a Potentially Contaminating Activity or Area of Potential Environmental Concern at the discretion of a Qualified Person. The sampling frequency must nevertheless remain statistically significant and rationalized
  5. The definition of “public body” would be expanded to include municipal corporations established under the Municipal Act, and
  6. The Excess Soil Regulation would permit multiple depot types by the same owner or operator at the same property or adjoining properties, excluding small liquid soil depots.

This blog post was written by Michael Hebert and Nathan Adams (primary author), members of the Mann Lawyers Environmental Law Group. Michael can be reached at 613-369-0360 or at michael.hebert@mannlawyers.com and Nathan at 613-369-0380 or at nathan.adams@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Estate Litigation
By: 

Posted January 7, 2025

Power of Attorney (“POA”) litigation has become a growing concern in legal and family circles as individuals face the complexities of aging, illness, and the[...]
Blog |
Business Law
By: 

Posted December 17, 2024

In today’s fast-paced world, businesses strive to simplify and expedite their processes. It is now commonplace to see businesses asking their customers to enter into[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights
By: 

Posted December 11, 2024

On October 28th, 2024, Ontario Bill 190, the Working for Workers Five Act, 2024, received royal assent. This latest legislative move builds on the strong[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law
By: 
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are under increased regulatory scrutiny in Canada due to their potential environmental and health risks. On July 27, 2024, Environment[...]
Blog |
Real Estate
By: 

Posted November 26, 2024

Finances are an important part of home buying. When looking to buy a home, a home purchaser will consider the funds that they have available[...]
Blog |
Real Estate
By: 

Posted November 19, 2024

Local: Ottawa City Council Approves New Development Charges Earlier this year, the Ottawa City Council approved new development charges, an increase of about 11-12% from[...]
Michael S. Hebert

Michael S. Hebert

I lead the environmental law practice group at Mann Lawyers LLP. I have been involved in either environmental law or commercial litigation for the past 35 years.  I have been fortunate to have been the counsel that initiated several groundbreaking environmental cases of national significance over the years.  I have extensive trial and appellate experience in environmental law and commercial litigation matters. I enjoy ongoing involvement in class actions, contaminated land and Brownfields sites, municipal planning and land development matters, due diligence in complex real estate transactions, renewable energy and off-set credits, clean tech, corporate and director’s liability and environmental appeals and approvals. I have also maintained an active commercial litigation practice in the areas of shareholder disputes, contract law, real estate law, construction, bankruptcy and insolvency.  I have served as an education lecturer for the Law Society of Ontario, the Canadian Bar Association, the Ontario Bar Association and several... Read More

Read More About Michael S. Hebert
Nathan Adams

Nathan Adams

With a diverse background in wildlife conservation and sustainable development spanning Canada, the United States, Malta, and Indonesia, I bring a unique perspective as an Associate at Mann Lawyers, specializing in corporate and environmental law. My expertise is built on over a decade of experience managing a biodiversity research business, coupled with a strong foundation in legal and scientific knowledge. My legal experience includes preparing for tribunal hearings and defending against environmental civil lawsuits and regulatory prosecutions. This combination of scientific and legal experience allows me to effectively handle a wide range of corporate and environmental matters for my clients. Before joining Mann Lawyers, I managed an international biodiversity conservation office, directed research expeditions in Indonesian rainforests, and contributed to wildlife conservation as a published scientist. My commitment to sustainability also led me to serve as a Senior Project Officer at the United Nations Association in Canada, where I secured... Read More

Read More About Nathan Adams