“Extra Breathing Room”: Dangers And Benefits Of Extending The Probation Period

“Extra Breathing Room”: Dangers And Benefits Of Extending The Probation Period

By:

Mann Lawyers

Posted May 14, 2019

Many employers require employees to agree to a probationary period (usually 3 months, but sometimes longer) during which the employer can dismiss the employee for any lawful reason whatsoever without notice or pay in lieu. The purpose of the probationary period is to allow the employer an opportunity to assess the new employee and determine whether the employee is doing well in his/her job. Probationary periods are not automatic; rather they must be provided for in the employment contract. While the Employment Standards Act, 2000 does not require the payment of mandatory termination pay during the first 3 months of employment, it is not a “probation period” as such.

Trouble can sometimes arise when an employer is unsure about a particular employee. The employer may want to give the employee a further opportunity to prove him/herself without foregoing the right to dismiss him or her without notice or pay in lieu.  In other cases, an employer may wish to dismiss the employee without notice or pay in lieu but needs the employee to work beyond the probation period set out in the contract for business reasons. In these situations, employers may consider extending the probationary period. However, employers must exercise caution. Much like the probationary period itself, the right to extend a probationary period is not automatic and must be set out in the original employment agreement. Failure to stipulate a right to extend the probation period can result in a constructive dismissal of the employee and give rise to an action in damages. Where a contract does contain such a provision, the provision must be exercised honestly and in good faith. If the probation is extended beyond 90 days, the Employer must still pay mandatory termination pay under the Employment Standards Act, 2000.

Probation periods are not as simple as the fabled “3-month rule.” A valid probationary clause (with or without an extension clause) is required. Employers who are unsure about their obligations to newer employees should seek out an employment lawyer before dismissing employees or extending their probation. Employees who have been dismissed without severance and told “but it’s within your probation period” may want to consider speaking to an employment lawyer to find out if they are entitled to damages.

This blog post was written by Nigel McKechnie, a member of our Employment Law team.  Nigel can be reached at 613-369-0382 or at [email protected].

 

More Resources

Blog |
Estate Litigation, Wills, Trusts and Estates
By: 

Posted June 15, 2026

Each year on June 15, communities around the world recognize World Elder Abuse Awareness Day, a time to raise awareness about a deeply concerning and[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates, Estate Administration
By: 

Posted June 3, 2026

Being named an estate trustee (commonly referred to as an executor) is often considered an honour; it reflects a high level of trust and confidence.[...]
Blog |
Real Estate
By: 

Posted May 26, 2026

Calling all Ontario homebuyers! In the excitement of purchasing your first home, relocating, or downsizing, it can be easy to lose track of critical legal[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates
By: 

Posted May 19, 2026

Q: As my parents’ Attorney for Personal Care, I am worried. My 92-year-old father and my 89-year-old mother live together in a single detached home,[...]
Blog |
Business Law
By: 

Posted May 13, 2026

In Ontario, under the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000 (the “Arthur Wishart Act”), franchisors are required to provide prospective franchisees a disclosure document, which[...]
Blog |
Commercial Litigation
By: 

Posted May 4, 2026

The 2025 Ontario Court of Appeal decision of Correa v. Valstar Homes (Oakville Sixth Line) Inc. (2025 ONCA 156), demonstrates that “time is of the[...]