Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Regulatory Steps in Ontario Lead to Legal Contest For Conservation Interests

Regulatory Steps in Ontario Lead to Legal Contest For Conservation Interests

By:

Mann Lawyers

Posted March 22, 2021

Recent regulatory actions by the Ontario provincial government are raising significant legal issues for conservation interests.

On December 8, 2020, Royal Assent was given to Bill 229, an omnibus bill which included significant amendments to the Conservation Authorities Act.  These amendments made changes to both the make-up and the role of a conservation authority, and included a requirement that at least 70% of the members of an authority that are appointed by municipalities be municipal councilors and removing the authority’s discretion to deny permission to a development project if a zoning order has been made by the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing under the Planning Act (a Ministerial Zoning Order).  Prior to the passing of the Bill, the proposed amendments were vigorously opposed by community groups and conservation authorities and sparked the resignation of several prominent members.  Despite this, the Bill was passed unchanged.

The concern was that when a Ministerial Zoning Order was issued for a development project, a conservation authority would be required to issue a permit, even where the development would be harmful to watershed management or conservation efforts.

This exact concern is currently being played out in Pickering, Ontario.  Last fall, the provincial government issued a Ministerial Zoning Order to allow for the development of a four million square foot warehouse on a 34-hectare parcel owned by Pickering Developments Inc. which is mostly covered by the Lower Duffins Creek wetland, a provincially-designated significant wetland.  The development would destroy the wetland.

As a result of the Ministerial Zoning Order, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) was required to issue a permit to allow the development to proceed.  The deadline to issue the permit was Friday, March 12, 2021.  On that day, the TRCA’s board of directors held an open meeting to discuss conditions that may be imposed on the permit.  In the end, the TRCA issued the permit with 33 conditions, including a requirement that the developer indemnify the TRCA.  The TRCA also stated publicly that it was issuing the permit under duress.  The developer has the right to appeal the permit conditions to the Minister of Natural Resources if it chooses to.

There had been speculation that Amazon was the intended tenant of the warehouse.  Unexpectedly, in the afternoon of Friday, March 12, 2021, Amazon announced that it would not be locating its warehouse at the site.  Subsequently, the Mayor of Pickering called for a pause on immediate development of the site. On Sunday, March 14, 2021, after these events, the developer announced that it would not alter or remove the wetland on its Pickering property.

The Ministerial Zoning Order, however, remains in place on the property.

In addition to efforts by local nature and environmental interest groups who have been actively protesting the destruction of the wetland, a court application has been launched to seek a stay of development on the wetland and challenge the Ministerial Zoning Order.  That application was scheduled to be heard by the Divisional Court on March 15, 2021.  At the hearing, the developer gave an undertaking to the court to not “harmfully alter, destroy, damage or interfere with” the wetland and wildlife habitats on the property.  This undertaking will remain in place until a hearing on the merits of the application, likely to be in May.

The wetland is a significant nesting ground for several migratory birds.  Concerns have been raised in the media that the development project had been pushed through quickly to allow for the excavation of the wetlands before the spring return of these birds for their nesting season.

Putting wetlands at further risk, in March the government tabled amendments to the Planning Act (Bill 257 currently at second reading) which would legislate that Ministerial Zoning Orders are not required and are deemed to never have been required to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (which contains a prohibition of development on wetlands).  Any wetlands subject to a Ministerial Zoning Order (past or present) could be developed, provided they are outside of the Greenbelt Area of Toronto.

In another ongoing project that calls to question the provincial government’s interest in protecting the natural environment, it is pushing forward with plans to construct a provincial highway through the environmentally sensitive Greenbelt Area north of Toronto.

This blog post was written by Cheryl Gerhardt McLuckie, a member of the Environmental Law team.  Cheryl can be reached at 613-369-0365 or at cheryl.mcluckie@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Family Law
By: 
Co-parenting with your ex-partner can be challenging. It involves constant coordination and communication about various aspects of your children’s lives. Whether it is about schedules,[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates
By: 
Over time, individuals could acquire assets in different jurisdictions that are governed by different legal systems. Similar to the consideration of double wills in distinguishing[...]
Blog |
Family Law
By: 

Posted January 31, 2024

In the first part of this series, we reviewed the background, trial, and appeal to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in Anderson v Anderson. This[...]
Blog |
Practice Management
By: 

Posted January 26, 2024

On July 17, 1797, ten lawyers were present at the Wilson’s Hotel in Newark, Upper Canada, to read “An Act for the better regulating the[...]
Blog |
Business Law
By: 

Posted January 23, 2024

A not-for-profit corporation incorporated pursuant to the Canada Not-for-Profit Corporations Act (the “CNCA”) is required to maintain certain records, including records as to its members,[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights
By: 

Posted January 17, 2024

In November of 2023, the Ontario government introduced new legislation, once again, amending the Employment Standards Act, strengthening employment and labour laws in the province.[...]
Cheryl Gerhardt McLuckie

Cheryl Gerhardt McLuckie

I practice in the areas of environment law and commercial litigation and am an active member of the environmental law group at Mann Lawyers LLP. Prior to joining Mann Lawyers in June of 2020, I practiced with a small law firm in Ottawa.  When the opportunity arose to join Mann Lawyers and become part of its exceptional team, I welcomed it.  Being part of a firm that offers a broad range of services will be of great value to my clients. In my environmental law practice, I assist my clients with all manner of issues arising from environmental contamination.   I have extensive experience in land contamination issues, an area which has undergone significant evolution in recent years.  I provide clients with a wide range of services in environmental law including litigation of environmental claims, defending environmental claims, advising on environmental risk, obligations and liabilities, engaging with the Ministry of the... Read More

Read More About Cheryl Gerhardt McLuckie

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.