Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

The Ontario Court of Appeal Overturns Decision Dismissing Action in Meekis v. Ontario

The Ontario Court of Appeal Overturns Decision Dismissing Action in Meekis v. Ontario

By:

Mann Lawyers

Posted August 12, 2021

On July 26th, 2021, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned a decision from Justice John Fregeau of the Thunder Bay Superior Court of Justice dismissing the action brought by the family of Brody Meekis against the Chief Coroner, the Regional Supervising Coroner and the Investigating Coroner for failure to investigate the death of their four year old son, Brody Meekis.

In a unanimous decision, the Court of Appeal allowed the family’s action to proceed stating that the motion judge erred in analyzing two of the grounds of the lawsuit namely, allegations of misfeasance of public office and breach of charter rights.

Brody died in 2014 from cardiac complications arising from Group A Streptococcal infection, commonly known as strep throat after the community nursing station refused to give an appointment for Brody’s illness.  Following his death, the coroner failed to conduct an adequate investigation as per the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario Guidelines. The Court of Appeal found that the motion judge did not consider the allegations that the coroner’s office discriminated against indigenous people by failing to attend to investigate deaths in First Nations communities.  If these allegations are proven at trial, the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario could be liable for misfeasance in a public office.

Furthermore, the Court of Appeal allowed the Meekis’ action to proceed under section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  Brody’s family claims damages pursuant to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms alleging breach of the equality rights. Section 15 provides that “Everyone has the right to equality before the law and to equal protection of the law without discrimination because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age or sex”.  The actions of the coroner in the Meekis case will be found to have violated their charter rights if the allegations are proven in court.

Significantly, at paragraph 154 of the decision, the Court of Appeal reported that “If the investigating coroner’s conduct in Brody’s case is proved to be part of a “blanket” policy of coronial non-attendance in places like Sandy Lake First Nation, this would amount to an effective denial of the benefit of coronial services available elsewhere in the province”, and that “requiring on-reserve Indigenous peoples to live without adequate coronial services could arguably amount to a burden imposed on individuals of a historically disadvantaged group, a burden which is not imposed on non-members of that group.”

This blog post was written by Karine Devost, a member of the Personal Injury team.  Karine can be reached at 613-369-0361 or at karine.devost@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights, Commercial Litigation

By: 

Posted May 23, 2023

Both in my commercial and employment litigation practice, I encounter Ontario business owners faced with serious charges laid against them under the Provincial Offences Act[...]
Blog |
Family Law

By: 

Posted May 18, 2023

The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Anderson v. Anderson, 2023 SCC 13, provides guidance on domestic contracts and the enforceability of an informal[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law

By: 

Posted May 16, 2023

When many people think of contaminated sites, they think of the usual suspects such as industrial properties and gas stations.  They may not think of[...]
Blog |
Business Law

By: 

Posted May 9, 2023

Often business owners reach a point where they are considering the sale of their business either through the sale of shares or the sale of[...]
Blog |
Family Law

By: 

Posted May 2, 2023

Overview of Tort Claims in Family Matters Tort claims can be made in family law matters, so as to prevent a multiplicity of proceedings and[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Posted April 25, 2023

In a case that recently was decided from the Court of Appeal of Ontario called Celestini v Shoplogix Inc., 2023 ONCA 131, the Court had[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.