Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin

Affirmative Action in University Admissions – What We Can Learn from Harvard

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Affirmative Action in University Admissions – What We Can Learn from Harvard

Posted October 31, 2019

As an alumnus of Harvard College, I followed with interest the lawsuit challenging Harvard’s affirmative action practices in admissions.  My time at the college transformed my worldview and was an enriching experience; I attribute much of this to the diversity and quality of the student body.  I was admittedly pleased to learn that Harvard successfully defended its practices in first instance.

Students for Fair Admissions alleged that Asians were discriminated against on the basis of race, contrary to Title VI of the United States’ Civil Rights Act.  It was alleged that, although qualified for admission, some Asian students were not admitted because Harvard uses a race conscious model to create a diverse student population.

In her ruling, Federal Judge Allison Burroughs found in favour of Harvard’s model.  She did not find evidence of intentional discrimination against Asian candidates in the College’s practices or policies.  She determined that there was no other way to achieve the diverse population at Harvard than to consider race in admissions.  Each party retained experts to statistically assess their admissions models and Harvard’s expert determined that there was not a statistically significant lower chance of admission for Asian students.  Finally, the University of Texas at Austin faced a similar challenge, and survived it; the court relied on that precedent.

Justice Burroughs acknowledged that some groups would necessarily be penalized in the name of racial diversity, but that the ends justified the means.  She also noted that Harvard could still do better, but that there was no need to tear the existing model down.

It is expected that this decision will be appealed.

Harvard has taken steps to promote equality on campus since my time there; the fraternity-like men-only “Finals Clubs” have been mandated to accept women and women’s clubs to accept men.  A failure to comply results in a ban from campus leadership positions, athletic captaincies, and endorsement for Harvard fellowships.  Not all clubs are pleased, and there is pushback in the form of lobbying for sanctions.  While not subject to a court decision, it strikes me again that some groups would necessarily be penalized (or perhaps better stated as “be less advantaged”) in the name of gender diversity.

Canada’s university admission system does not generally use race-based or gender-based affirmative action; however, as a Globe and Mail article comparing our system to the US points out, many professional schools are not reflective of the population and lack diversity.  Additionally, some have created programs to assist Indigenous students to enroll.

Ontario’s Human Rights Code does not preclude affirmative action; a university is not compelled by this section to create special programs, but is able to do so.  Harvard’s admissions practices might be upheld here:

14(1) A right under Part I is not infringed by the implementation of a special program designed to relieve hardship or economic disadvantage or to assist disadvantaged persons or groups to achieve or attempt to achieve equal opportunity or that is likely to contribute to the elimination of the infringement of rights under Part I.  R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, s. 14 (1).

Racialized applicants certainly can assert discrimination in admissions.

Harvard’s admissions challenges are worth watching closely.  There may be valuable takeaways that could legally and justifiably enrich the Canadian university experience.

This blog post was written by Alayna Miller, a member of the Employment team.  She can be reached at 613-369-0374 or at alayna.miller@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Business Law

By: 

Posted October 20, 2021

On October 19, 2021, the new Ontario Business Registry System launched. This new online registry now enables businesses and not-for-profit corporations to directly access services[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law

By: 

Posted October 14, 2021

In the decision of Greenpeace Canada (2471256 Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks), 2021 ONSC 4521, released September 3, 2021,[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Posted October 1, 2021

This blog continues our exploration of the potential employment law consequences stemming from the degree of control a party exerts within a variety of business[...]
Blog |
Personal Injury

By: 

Posted September 27, 2021

Personal Injury lawyers and their clients are all too familiar with the carnage and suffering caused by impaired drivers.  Canada has the worst rate of[...]
Blog |
Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Business Law

By: 

Posted September 24, 2021

As is noted by the Court of Appeal in McEwen (Re), released August 12, 2021, referred to here as “Traders”, the BIA is a complete[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates

By: 

Posted September 23, 2021

In-Trust For Accounts have become a common way for parents and grandparents to set aside money to finance their children or grandchildren’s post-secondary education. A[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.