Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Bee Law?

Bee Law?


Posted June 10, 2020

The past few months have been stressful. Let’s take a short reprieve to learn about something that most of us, save and except a select few, likely never even knew existed. I like to call it Bee Law because, frankly, Bee Law sounds fun. When I talk about Bee Law ,I am referring to the Ontario Bees Act, the Provincial Act of the Ontario Legislative Assembly covering all things bee related. If you are curious, you can read the Act in its entirety here.

The structure of the Act follows a similar pattern to most Acts of the Ontario Legislative Assembly. It first outlines a few key terms including:

“apiary” which means a place where bees and beekeeping equipment of a beekeeper are located;

“bees” which means the insects known as Apis mellifera;

along with a number of other key terms. The Act then empowers the Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs with the ability to appoint a Provincial Apiarist who in turn has the power to administer the rules and regulations created by the Act and also performs a key inspection role.

As you read a bit further, the purpose of the Act becomes evident. The Act aims to regulate the ways in which bees can be imported, transported, kept and sold while also creating safeguards including inspection rights, certification processes and reporting requirements to ensure healthy, disease-free bee hives. If a person contravenes any provision of the Ontario Bees Act, the first offence can carry a fine of up to $2000 and up to $5000 for any subsequent breach.

Knowing a beekeeper personally, I recognize that the obligations and responsibilities of beekeepers are taken very seriously by most people who keep bees. It is not something to take lightly, a fact easily confirmed by quickly glancing over the Ontario Bees Act.

I now want to turn your attention to what I believe to be the most interesting section of the Bees Act, the sections describing the special property rights in hives and swarms of bees. Historically, only domestic animals could be owned while wild animals were the subject of what is called qualified property, a lower ranking property right more akin to possession.

To illustrate, if a dog were to escape from its owner’s possession and then another person subsequently acquires possession of the dog, the owner of the dog would have priority over the possessor. However, this common law principle that an owner enjoys priority over a possessor caused problems in relation to wild animals whose nature may be to escape and then subsequently be recaptured by another person. This in turn led to the development of qualified property which in its simplified form effectively means that your property rights in a wild animal are tied to your ability to maintain possession over the wild animal. If the animal escapes and another person acquires possession of the animal, you may not be able to recover that animal.

As you can see from sections 2 and 3 of the Ontario Bees Act below, the Act breaks with this common law principal and carves out special rights for beekeepers should a swarm leave the hive. I also find it somewhat amusing to visualize the occurrence of an event covered by section 3(2), perhaps in a relay race type scenario where the owner hands off his rights to another person better equipped to pursue the bees. Happy reading!

Bees in hive private property

2 Bees reared and kept in hives are private property.

Right of owner to pursue and recover swarm

3 (1) Subject to subsections (2), (3) and (4), where a swarm of bees leaves a hive, the owner of the swarm may enter upon the premises of any person and recover the swarm.

Where owner declines to pursue swarm

(2) Where the owner of a swarm of bees that leaves its hive declines to pursue it and another person takes up the pursuit, such other person is subrogated to all the rights of the owner in respect of the swarm.

Owner of premises to be notified

(3) Where the right to recover a swarm of bees is claimed under subsection (1) or (2), the person claiming the swarm shall notify the owner of the premises on which the swarm has settled before entering the premises and shall compensate the owner for any damage to the premises caused by the entry.

When right of property in swarm lost

(4) Where a swarm of bees leaves a hive and settles in an occupied hive owned by a person other than the owner of the swarm, the owner of the swarm loses all right of property in the swarm.

This blog post was written by Mark Fortier-Brynaert, a member of the Business Law and Wills and Estates teams.  He can be reached at 613-566-0380 or at


More Resources

Blog |
Family Law


Posted January 26, 2023

You have made the decision to separate from your partner. Now what? You have a house, a pension, maybe you have children, debts, and an[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law


Posted January 24, 2023

The Ontario government has moved ahead with changes to the Ontario Wetland Evaluation System in support of Bill 23, More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022. [...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights


Posted January 17, 2023

While each of these cases could have its own blog post, we have decided to create a list of important cases for employers to be[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights


Posted January 10, 2023

Constructive Dismissal is an incredibly important protection for Ontario employees – one that is often used successfully to enforce employment rights. If you ask members[...]
Blog |
Estate Litigation, Wills, Trusts and Estates


Posted January 4, 2023

Executing powers of attorney is an important component of estate planning and allows individuals to decide who will manage their affairs should they become incapable[...]
Blog |
Estate Litigation, Wills, Trusts and Estates


Posted December 20, 2022

Acting as an estate trustee can be a burdensome task, and it can become particularly difficult in circumstances where beneficiaries cannot be so easily found[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.