Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin

My Pet was Injured Because of Someone Else’s Negligence – What are My Options?

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

My Pet was Injured Because of Someone Else’s Negligence – What are My Options?

By:

Posted November 5, 2019

A great number of Canadians are owners of beloved house pets. At least 41% of households have at least one dog and 38% of households have at least one cat. These house pets become a part of our daily lives and quickly become a cherished member of the family. But what happens when your pet is injured or killed as a result of someone else’s negligence? Who can be held responsible?

Under the Canadian legal system, animals are classified as property. This means that when they are damaged or lost, the owners are compensated according to the market value of the animal. In the very few cases where damages were awarded for the loss of an animal, the courts have been reluctant to offer anything other than the value of the animal itself. However, the courts are slowly starting to widen the scope by awarding damages for pain and suffering associated with the loss of canine companionship. The 2006 court’s decision in Ferguson v. Birchmount Boarding Kennels Ltd was the first to introduce damages for pain and suffering where a dog escaped from the kennel and was never found again. The court awarded $2,527, which included $1,417 for pain and suffering and the inconvenience experienced by the plaintiffs who were in Hawaii at the time of the incident.

This fairly new phenomenon was later discussed in the 2010 case of Arnold v. Bekkers Pet Care Inc., where a dog was euthanized while staying at a kennel. The plaintiff claimed that the kennel was negligent in not observing the dog’s deteriorating symptoms and not intervening sooner. In his decision, the judge recognized the profound relationship that a human can have with a dog, and that the suffering associated with the loss of pet exceeds the damages of simply replacing the dog. The plaintiff was awarded $2000 for mental distress as well as compensation for half of her veterinarian bills due to the court’s findings that the kennel’s negligence only exacerbated the situation. Although both these cases do not involve a veterinarian malpractice claim, it could likely have an impact on those individuals who accept to care for animals, including veterinarians. In Canada, there have been very few veterinarian malpractice claims. This is mostly due to the hefty cost of litigation in comparison to the potential damages that may arise from the claim. Case law trends related to damages seem to suggest that these types of claims should be litigated in Small Claims Court, where the monetary jurisdiction is capped at $25,000.

The low inventory of claims against veterinarians could also be explained by settlement agreements that are reached between both parties to avoid litigation.

It is important to remember that the professional practice of veterinarians is carefully regulated by both provincial and federal legislation. With its own regulatory bodies, disciplinary measures can be taken to properly deal with malpractice complaints. Disciplinary Committees have the power to revoke or suspend a license, impose terms, conditions, limitations or specific restrictions on a license or certificate, require the member to be reprimanded, and impose fines and costs.

The legal acknowledgement of mental distress associated with the loss of a pet is likely to increase the number of veterinarian malpractice claims. On top of the damages assessed for the replacement cost of the animal, all veterinarian bills and associated costs, and the time someone may have taken off of work, it will now be up to the courts to assess the degree of emotional distress caused by the loss of a furry best friend.

This blog post was written by Karine Devost, a member of the Personal Injury team, with the assistance of Articling Student, Yasmine Atif.  Karine can be reached at 613-369-0361 or at karine.devost@mannlawyers.com.

 

More Resources

Blog |
Business Law

By: 

Posted October 20, 2021

On October 19, 2021, the new Ontario Business Registry System launched. This new online registry now enables businesses and not-for-profit corporations to directly access services[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law

By: 

Posted October 14, 2021

In the decision of Greenpeace Canada (2471256 Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks), 2021 ONSC 4521, released September 3, 2021,[...]
Blog |
Employment, Labour, and Human Rights

By: 

Posted October 1, 2021

This blog continues our exploration of the potential employment law consequences stemming from the degree of control a party exerts within a variety of business[...]
Blog |
Personal Injury

By: 

Posted September 27, 2021

Personal Injury lawyers and their clients are all too familiar with the carnage and suffering caused by impaired drivers.  Canada has the worst rate of[...]
Blog |
Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Business Law

By: 

Posted September 24, 2021

As is noted by the Court of Appeal in McEwen (Re), released August 12, 2021, referred to here as “Traders”, the BIA is a complete[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates

By: 

Posted September 23, 2021

In-Trust For Accounts have become a common way for parents and grandparents to set aside money to finance their children or grandchildren’s post-secondary education. A[...]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.