Offices in Ottawa and Perth
(613) 722-1500

CONTACT US (613) 722-1500

Unionized Employees Can Bring Applications Directly to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

Unionized Employees Can Bring Applications Directly to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

By:

Posted December 15, 2022

In a recent decision called Weilgosh v London District Catholic School Board, the Human Rights Tribunal (“HRTO”) determined that it had concurrent jurisdiction with labour arbitrators to determine human rights issues for unionized employees. This potentially opens up a “passing lane” for unionized employees to seek a remedy, without first having to exhaust the grievance process.

As some background information regarding unionized employees, the legal principle is that labour arbitrators have jurisdiction with respect to determining disputes between the employer and employee under collective bargaining agreements.

Those collective bargaining agreements must provide for the ability to settle disputes, and the ability to go to arbitration. The typical process where a dispute arises is that the employee will bring a grievance, and be represented by the union that represents them. Where the dispute cannot be resolved, the parties may proceed to arbitration where an arbitrator has jurisdiction to decide the matter.

For non-unionized employees, disputes with their employers go to various tribunals, or court, for example, within a wrongful dismissal claim. For those employees who are unionized, they instead must proceed via the grievance process found in the collective agreement.

The decision in Weilgosh, however, changes the process for unionized employees for human rights issues. For Ontario, the decision builds on the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in North Regional Health Authority v Horrocks, which stood for the principle that labour arbitrators have exclusive jurisdiction over all disputes arising out of the collective bargaining agreements unless legislation says otherwise. The question to be answered by the HRTO in Weilgosh was whether or not the Labour Relations Act, granted exclusive jurisdiction to the arbitrator, and whether or not the Human Rights Code of Ontario displaced this exclusive jurisdiction.

Weilgosh, answering this question determined that the Labour Relations Act, did in fact grant exclusive jurisdiction to decide claims of discrimination and harassment falling within the scope of the collective agreement, but that the Ontario Human Rights Code demonstrated a clear legislative intent to expressly displace the labour arbitrator’s exclusive jurisdiction.

What this means, is that unionized employees are free to bring an Application directly to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, rather than necessarily going through the grievance process and through arbitration. For unionized employers this will no doubt cause additional headaches requiring them to defend in multiple locations. For unionized employees, it may be welcomed, as they will now be able to proceed directly to the HRTO.

This blog post was written by Travis Ujjainwalla, a member of our Employment Law team.  He can be reached at 613-566-2060 or at travis.ujjainwalla@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Business Law
By: 
Can the use of a “thumbs-up” emoji in a text message create legally binding obligations? Last summer’s decision by the Saskatchewan Court of King’s Bench,[...]
Blog |
Real Estate
By: 

Posted June 26, 2024

A 2023 Ontario Superior Court case, Lake v Cambridge (City), 2023 ONSC 5200, confirmed that a purchaser is entitled to complete a transfer relying on[...]
Blog |
Business Law
By: 

Posted June 18, 2024

This is an update on my earlier blog posted in 2022 titled “New Requirements for Private Federal Corporations to Report Individuals with Significant Control Coming[...]
Blog |
Estate Litigation
By: 

Posted June 11, 2024

“For it is in giving that we receive.” –Francis of Assisi Many of us grew up hearing this mantra. Good people give back. Generous people[...]
Blog |
Real Estate
By: 
What is title? “Title” is a legal term for a person or company’s rights of ownership in a private property. This is different from a[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates, Business Law, Real Estate
By: 

Posted May 28, 2024

The recent announcement from the Federal Government regarding an increase in the capital gains inclusion rate for individuals, trusts, and corporations has sparked significant discussion.[...]
Travis Ujjainwalla

Travis Ujjainwalla

I am a member of the Employment, Human Rights, and Labour group.  I have represented clients on litigation matters including, wrongful dismissals, constructive dismissals, human rights claims, and employee grievances. I give advice on various pieces of legislation including, the Employment Standards Act, the Labour Relations Act, the Ontario Human Rights Code, the Canada Labour Code, the Canadian Human Rights Act, the occupational Health and Safety Act, the Workplace Safety and insurance Act, and the Personal Information and Electronics Act. I also provide advice on employer rights under Collective Agreements. I have represented clients within the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, the Ontario Labour Relations Board, the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, and the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. I have also helped unionized employers deal with grievances at arbitration. After receiving my LL.B. from the National University of Ireland Galway, I was called to the Ontario Bar in 2017. I... Read More

Read More About Travis Ujjainwalla

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.