Commercial Litigation

Shareholder, Partnership, Oppression, & Derivative Disputes

Our Commercial Litigation group has extensive experience advancing and defending the interests of corporate stakeholders.

Whether a stakeholder (shareholder, former shareholder, director, officer, affiliate, creditor, etc.) is aligned with the majority interest, a minority interest, or finds itself in a deadlock, there are rights and obligations that exist among stakeholders to ensure fair treatment and remedies available to address wrongdoing or to break a deadlock.

The oppression remedy is available to certain stakeholders whose legal or equitable rights have been compromised by the corporation (or by other stakeholders vis-à-vis the corporation) acting in a manner that is oppressive, unfairly prejudicial, or that disregards the interests of a stakeholder. Derivative actions allow certain stakeholders to advance claims in the name of the corporation, for wrongs committed against the corporation where the board of directors has chosen not to advance a claim on behalf of the corporation. The oppression remedy and derivative actions are powerful tools meant to protect minority interests.

We assist clients in understanding these rights, obligations, and remedies so that clients can avoid disputes that distract from business objectives. Where conflict cannot be avoided, we advance and defend client interests in court.

Connect with our Team

Offices in Ottawa and Perth     (613) 722-1500

Related Service Areas

Appeals
Arbitration & ADR
Contract Disputes
Director, Officer, & Governance Disputes
Distribution & Franchise Disputes
Public Law, Regulatory, & Not-For-Profit
Public Procurement

More Resources

Blog |
Business Law
By: 

Posted February 17, 2026

Franchises are an attractive business model in Canada, and with good reason: franchisees can start their own business with the added comfort of working within[...]
Blog |
Business Law
By: 

Posted February 10, 2026

Entering into a franchise relationship is a major business decision for both franchisors and franchisees, carrying long-term implications for everyone involved. Each party brings its[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates
By: 

Posted February 2, 2026

Cottages often carry decades of memories—but they also carry big estate planning risks, especially as property values skyrocket. A recent Ontario decision, Haddock v. Haddock,[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law
By: 

Posted January 27, 2026

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals,” are persistent synthetic compounds used in a variety of products, including firefighting foams, non-stick cookware,[...]
Blog |
Commercial Litigation
By: 

Posted January 20, 2026

The 2025 Ontario Court of Appeal decision of Gallant v Johnson (2025 ONCA 419) demonstrates the limitations of the Court to fix for the parties[...]
Blog |
Employment, Human Rights and Labour
By: 
As of January 1, 2026, new changes to the Ontario Employment Standards Act, 2000 (the “ESA”) have come into effect. These changes arise from the[...]