How Enforceable are Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreements in Employment Contracts?

 In Employment Law

It is common for clients to seek advice about the legality of non-competition and non-solicitation clauses (sometimes referred to as “restrictive covenants”) in their employment contracts.   For someone who has recently lost their job, the idea of having to sit on the bench for months or face risking a law suit can present a serious dilemma.

On the other hand, employers often share key confidential information with their employees and trust them with their clients, product and know-how, so if the employment relationship is terminated, they understandably want to put conditions in the employment contract in an attempt to bring a reasonable level of protection to their commercial interests.

So what is the difference between a non-competition agreement and a non-solicitation agreement? Are these agreements actually enforceable? What if the agreement has to do with the sale of a business?

.The Difference Between Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation:


A clause in an agreement stating that the employee agrees not to work for or start a business that is similar to their employers.

Example Situation: if a hairstylist worked for a salon for a number of years and learned all the tricks of the trade, then left the salon to open up her own salon down the street.


A clause in an agreement stating that the employee agrees not to approach employees of the company and encourage them to leave the employer for new job opportunities, or approach clients of the company for their business.

Example Situation: if that same hairstylist opens her new salon, tries to persuade her old co-workers to start working for her, and contacts clients of her old salon to convince them to bring their business to her new salon.

Are Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Clauses Enforceable?

  • Generally, non-competition clauses in regular employment relationships are difficult to enforce in Ontario.  Employers and employees alike may be better served by giving serious consideration to whether such a clause should even be included in an employment contract at all.
  • However, non-solicitation clauses may be enforceable, but need to be clear, unambiguous, and reasonable in light of the employee’s position, knowledge and responsibilities.
  • From the commercial perspective, non-competition clauses that are included in employment contracts made in the context of the sale of a business will be presumably enforceable (more on this later).

As a general rule, the courts in Canada have considered clauses which restrict a former employee from working in their chosen field as contrary to public policy. The reason is that stopping someone from competing interferes with individual liberty and restricts open competition. Consequently, non-competition clauses included in regular employment contracts are difficult to enforce.

What a court is more likely to do in regular employment situations is to enforce a non-solicitation agreement, which is designed to prevent a former employee from contacting the company’s clients and employees for a defined period of time after the employment.

What makes a Non-Competition or Non-Solicitation Agreement Enforceable?

Whether it is a non-competition clause or a non-solicitation clause, one of the key questions a court will try to answer before determining if it is enforceable is “how reasonable is the restriction?”  Three main questions that factor into determining how reasonable the agreement is include[1]:

1.      What is the geographic scope?   

Anywhere in the world” is too broad, and is less likely to be considered a reasonable geographic scope than one with a limited radius.

Interestingly, while a non-competition agreement must be geographically limited, a non-solicitation agreement may not need to be geographically limited to be valid. Due to new technological developments and social media, customers are no longer limited geographically, and the Supreme Court of Canada has recently concluded that geographical limitations in non-solicitation agreements have generally become obsolete.[2]

2.      How long is the restriction meant to last? 

It would not be reasonable to prevent a former employee from competing indefinitely. There needs to be an end date for when the agreement expires. Each situation will be different, but generally the shorter the restriction period, the more likely it will be to resist scrutiny. Six months will seem more reasonable than five years.

3.      What is the scope of the prohibited activity?   

Is the person restricted from working for a specific list of competitors, or does the clause try to stop the employee from working for “any businesses competitive with the employer or that of any of its subsidiaries and affiliates”? This might be too broad to be considered reasonable. The purpose of allowing restrictive covenants is to protect legitimate business interests only.

What about Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreements involving the Sale of a Business?

Commercial Context vs. Employment Context

The law differentiates between how enforceable these agreements are within a general employment context (the relationship between an employer and employee), and the commercial context (one that arises in connection with the sale of a business).  This distinction was emphasized in the Supreme Court of Canada case: Payette v. Guay. Payette was concerned about the how enforceable the a non-compete clause was in the sale of a business.  Justice Wagner wrote that:

The criteria for analyzing restrictive covenants to be reasonable will be much broader in the commercial context than in the context of employment.  I am therefore of the opinion that, in the commercial context, a restrictive covenant is lawful unless it can be established on a balance of probabilities that its scope is unreasonable.   (emphasis added)

In other words, restrictive covenants born in the commercial context will be presumed to be enforceable.  This stands in direct contrast to the standard employment context we have been talking about, which places the onus of demonstrating that the restriction is reasonable on the party who is trying to have the agreement enforced (usually the employer).

[1]Elsley v. J.G. Collins Ins. Agencies Ltd., [1978] 2 S.C.R. 916

[2]Payette v. Guay inc., 2013 SCC 45

This blog post was written by Colleen Hoey, a Partner in the Employment team.  She can be reached at 613-369-0366 or at

Recommended Posts
Showing 5 comments
  • Avatar

    If a franchise business goes under, and the franchisee wanted to start a similar business or stay in their same field of work, would a non-compete clause be enforceable in ontario?

  • Avatar

    Reblogged this on mores web development.

  • Avatar

    Hi there. I’m an electrician working on an on going project in which the client is not happy working with my employer. The client is quite happy with me and the work that I have been doing for them and they have approached me with an offer to work directly for them by dismissing my employer. My question is would I be caught with the non-solicitation agreement that I signed only three months ago upon being hired? Or is there a loop hold because they have approached me with the offer?
    Also, if I had an electrician friend that had a business, could I get around the agreement by him taking on the electrical contract with the client and I work for him?
    Any help or advise would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you.

  • Avatar

    While with my ex-employer, I had access to & downloaded customer files from time to time for the purpose of my job as a sales representative/account manager. During the term of my almost 7 years of employment, I’ve always felt discriminated against and had actually filed a discrimination claim with the human rights tribunal at one point. Prior to my departure, I emailed myself all of my old email exchanges with regards to these claims, personal items (doctors appointments etc.), emails of my self asking for equality and proof of them turning me down and also emailed myself customer files that showed the names of my peers assigned to specific organizations to back up my claims of inequality. Since then, I received a letter from a lawyer stating that I must “return” these files… I’m assuming I have to give them written promise that I have discarded them and/or won’t use them, while I’m also concerned about how far they can take this… I’m doing similar work now with what I believe to be non-competitive (maybe even complimentary… a little bit of a grey area) & have not used their customer files. I don’t believe I even have them any longer as I’ve scanned my emails to see if I’ve kept them but believe when I figured there is no point in going any further with human rights issues, I deleted them. I am a little worried that in my current role, I might unknowingly contact a prospect that I come across online, who happens to be in their database and it will be assumed I used their file. That being said, the employment contract is very vague and only mentions non-solicitation of individuals that I had contact with, over the past 12 months.

    I’ve actually recently even referred someone to them, in an online forum and turned away an inquiry because it was someone I had dealt with, while with my ex-employer. Should I simply respond to the lawyer to say I’ve discarded the files and have not, and for the next 12 months will not solicit to anyone that I was in contact with while employed with them?

  • Avatar
    Educated Squirrel

    My new contract has the following non-solication clause which states I may not “enter into any contractual arrangement with anyone who was an Employee”, for 12 months.

    There is no geographic scope, or scope of industry of the contract.

    1. Is this enforceable?
    2. Would this prevent me from doing some side-work with a co-worker, so long as the work was done in a different industry from our employer, and does not take place during working hours?
    3. I have not signed this contract yet, what if I signed an agreement with my co-worker before signing this new employment contract?

    I would appreciate any advice, and under stand it would be merely an opinion. Thanks.

Leave a Comment

Start typing and press Enter to search