The Temporary Suspension of Temporary Layoff Rules Now a Little Less Temporary

The Temporary Suspension of Temporary Layoff Rules Now a Little Less Temporary

By:

Mann Lawyers

Posted September 4, 2020

On September 3, 2020 the Ontario Government announced that they were extending the stay on the temporary layoff rules under the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA) to prevent temporary layoffs from automatically becoming permanent job losses.

Normally, under 56 (2) of the ESA once an employee has been on a temporary layoff for more than 13 weeks (or 20 weeks if the employee was in receipt of certain benefits) the temporary layoff is converted to a dismissal.  This dismissal triggers the employer’s obligation to provide notice/severance.  The concern the government is trying to address is that many businesses are not yet in a position to be able to recall all of their employees and those same businesses cannot afford to pay out notice and severance liabilities to their employees. This regulatory amendment delays these terminations and severance liabilities and will provide businesses more time to recover financially.

According to the announcement, employers will now have until January 2, 2021 to recall those employees they had placed on temporary layoff.

The government’s decision to have a fixed date by which employers must recall their employees is helpful although given that today (September 4) was the day that Employers were supposed to have made the decision to recall or terminate, I suspect that the news comes a little late for some.

One other rather important issue is that despite the announcement that the temporary lay off rules are being extended, the actual Regulation  228/20 – has not yet been amended (or at least not published).

This blog post was written by Colleen Hoey, a Partner in the Employment team.  She can be reached at 613-369-0366 or at Colleen.Hoey@mannlawyers.com.

More Resources

Blog |
Business Law
By: 

Posted February 10, 2026

Entering into a franchise relationship is a major business decision for both franchisors and franchisees, carrying long-term implications for everyone involved. Each party brings its[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates
By: 

Posted February 2, 2026

Cottages often carry decades of memories—but they also carry big estate planning risks, especially as property values skyrocket. A recent Ontario decision, Haddock v. Haddock,[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law
By: 

Posted January 27, 2026

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals,” are persistent synthetic compounds used in a variety of products, including firefighting foams, non-stick cookware,[...]
Blog |
Commercial Litigation
By: 

Posted January 20, 2026

The 2025 Ontario Court of Appeal decision of Gallant v Johnson (2025 ONCA 419) demonstrates the limitations of the Court to fix for the parties[...]
Blog |
Employment, Human Rights and Labour
By: 
As of January 1, 2026, new changes to the Ontario Employment Standards Act, 2000 (the “ESA”) have come into effect. These changes arise from the[...]
Blog |
Family Law
By: 
In Ontario (Director, Family Responsibility Office) v. Petersoo, 2025 ONCJ 569, Justice Stanley Sherr delivers a compelling and instructive decision on the enforcement of child[...]