What is Required When a Fixed Term Contract has Expired?

What is Required When a Fixed Term Contract has Expired?

By:

Mann Lawyers

Posted May 30, 2018

There are many reasons an employer may want to hire a worker on a fixed term contract.  It could be to cover a maternity/parental leave, complete a specific project or because there is a fixed budget. Other times, an organization and the employee like the sense of certainty and mutual commitment that can be created by a fixed term contract. Regardless of the reason, typically when an employee and employer enter into a fixed term contract it is understood that when the term has expired, there is no additional obligation to pay reasonable notice or severance.  The Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA) Regulations 288/01 confirms that notice is not required where “an employee who is hired on the basis that his or her employment is to terminate on the expiry of a definite term or the completion of a specific task.”  The idea is that the employee knew (or had notice) from the outset of when their final day of work would be.

There are some important exceptions to the rule that employees on term contracts do not need to be provided with notice. Specifically, reasonable notice is required when

(a) the employment terminates before the expiry of the term or the completion of the task;

(b) the term expires or the task is not yet completed more than 12 months after the employment commences; or

(c) the employment continues for three months or more after the expiry of the term or the completion of the task.

These exceptions can all take employers by surprise but my focus today is on the twelve month threshold.  Whether it is an employee hired on a three year term or an employee who has had their terms renewed successively so that all together they have worked more than 12 months, the bottom line is that once that twelve month threshold is met, the employee will be entitled to reasonable notice of termination.

Where I see this exception having the most impact over the next while is in relation to term employees hired to cover parental leaves of absence.  Previously, most “maternity leaves” were twelve months or less.  A term employee hired to cover a one year maternity leave would not exceed the 12 month threshold under the ESA regulations meaning that employers did not have to give reasonable notice once the term expired.  With the recent changes to both the Employment Insurance Act and the ESA, some new parents may now elect to take up to 18 months of job protected leave (parental and pregnancy leave).  Consequently, more employers may find themselves hiring temporary or contract employees for 18 month terms.  In these circumstances it will not be enough that the 18 month term contract comes to an end, employers will need to provide reasonable notice to those term employees hired to cover a parental leave which exceeds 12 months.

Take away – if you have a fixed term contract that lasts 12 months or more, employees will be entitled to reasonable notice.  Employers may want to revisit their term contract agreements to specifically address the question of reasonable notice for term employees.

This blog post was written by Colleen Hoey, a Partner in the Employment team.  She can be reached at 613-369-0366 or at [email protected].

More Resources

Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates, Estate Administration
By: 

Posted April 10, 2026

Losing a loved one is never easy. Beyond the emotional toll, there are also legal and financial responsibilities after someone passes away, which can be[...]
Blog |
Employment, Human Rights and Labour
By: 

Posted April 7, 2026

In the world of employment law, reaching a settlement can often feel like the finish line. But what happens if one side agrees to a[...]
Blog |
Wills, Trusts and Estates
By: 

Posted March 30, 2026

Having a conversation with aging parents about estate planning can feel uncomfortable, but it’s important to start the conversation, not only to put documents in[...]
Blog |
Environmental Law
By: 

Posted March 25, 2026

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in Egan v. National Research Council of Canada, 2026 ONSC 1429, is a landmark in Canadian environmental class[...]
Blog |
Commercial Litigation
By: 

Posted March 18, 2026

Rectification is a long-standing recognized equitable remedy that the Court may grant as a means of correcting errors in the recording of terms in written[...]
Blog |
Family Law
By: 

Posted March 9, 2026

While it is common knowledge that there are tax consequences in relation to spousal support in Canada, i.e. taxable to the recipient and tax deductible[...]